Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006094. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006094.pub2

Stock 1998.

Methods Type of targeted behaviour: increase in test ordering (BMD test)
Study design: cluster RCT
Country: USA
Participants Setting: primary care
68 providers
Condition: people with high likelihood of osteoporosis
Interventions 1. Professional intervention (reminder: long narrative clinical reports on BMD test)
2. Usual care control group: short technical reports on BMD test
Outcomes Professional practice: number of BMD tests ordered (length of follow‐up not clear); physician understanding of test results; referrals to specialists; further testing to rule out secondary causes of osteoporosis; pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis
Patient level: none
Notes Justification for intervention type: not reported
Intervention fidelity: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Report states: “computer‐generated allocation sequence”
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk Insufficient information provided
Free of other bias? Unclear risk Not reported