3. Summary of included studies.
aBaird 2013 assesses both conditional and unconditional cash transfers. bFenn 2015 assesses both unconditional cash transfers and food vouchers. cHidrobo 2014 assesses both conditional cash transfers and food vouchers. dThis includes different interventions that aimed to generate income of participants (e.g. integrated agricultural programmes, community development programmes). ePorter 2016 assessed a public works (80%) (cash/food‐for‐work) or unconditional cash transfer government programme (20%). Results were reported for the entire population, not disaggregated according to intervention received.
RCT: randomised controlled trial.