Eggert 1988.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Mean age in days at recruitment: Intervention = 3.15 Control = 2.56 Mean body weight in kg of participants: Intervention = 3.18 Control = 3.16 SDs for these means not reported |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: Drager 76 phototherapy unit equipped with 6 special blue fluorescent lights (Philips TL 20 W/52BAM blue emission range 410 to 520 nm, maximum 460 nm). Four outer walls of the incubator draped with white cloth additionally N = 36 Control: Drager 76 phototherapy unit equipped with 6 standard fluorescent lights (Philips TL 20 W/52BAM blue emission range 410 to 520 nm, maximum at 460 nm) used without drapes N = 34 |
|
Outcomes | Mean decrease in serum bilirubin after 24 hours of phototherapy Mean duration of phototherapy Adverse effects not reported |
|
Notes | A third group included in the study used a different phototherapy unit. This group was not included in this review. Study was conducted in Germany | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described in the manuscript |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described in the manuscript |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants: neonates by definition blinded, but parents not blinded. Clinicians/Nurses not blinded. The type of intervention may have influenced handling of the baby by parents and healthcare providers |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Not reported. We judged bilirubin measurement to be an objective measurement not affected by lack of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No dropouts reported in the manuscript |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No protocol available. All expected outcomes and all outcome in the methods reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias identified |