Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;4(3):89–99. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2019-035

Table 4.

Results of Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse.

Authors No. of patients Design Morbidity (%) Mortaility (%) Improvement of continence (%) Improvement of constipation (%) New onset of constipation (%) Recurrence No. (%) Follow-up (month)
Stevenson et al. 1998[56] 30 Prospective 13 3 70 64 NS 0 (0) 18#
Xynos et al. 1999[57] 10 Prospective 10 0 71 NS NS 0 (0) 12*
Kellokumpu et al. 2000[21] 17 Prospective 6 0 80 64 67 0 (0) 24#
Benoist et al. 2001[22] 18 Retrospective 11 0 100 100 0 0 (0) 20*
Rose et al. 2002[58] 97 Prospective 26 0 NS NS NS NS NS
Lechaux et al. 2005[32] 13 Prospective 8 0 38 8 NS 1 (8) 36#
Ashari et al. 2005[59] 117 Prospective 9 1 62 69 0 2 (3) 62#
Kim et al. 2012[60] 18 Retrospective 11 6 0 0 NS 2 (11) 40#
Laubert et al. 2012[61] 154 Prospective 20 1 61 74 NS 10 (10) 56*
Formijne Jonkers et al. 2014[46] 28 Retrospective 32 0 94 63 8 0 (0) 57*

NS, not stated; *mean; # median