Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;4(3):89–99. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2019-035

Table 8.

Comparison among the Results of Different Procedures Reviewed.

Laparoscopic Perineal
Total LSR LPMR LVMR LRR Total Delorme Altemeier
No. of studies 35 7 9 9 10 35 17 18
Total number of patients 1,711 202 327 680 502 2,464 770 1,694
Morbidity,% 12 (202/1,635) 14 (23/170) 11 (37/327) 9 (55/636) 17 (87/502) 14 (350/2,464) 18 (135/770) 13 (216/1,694)
Mortality, % 0.5 (8/1,711) 0 (0/202) 0.3 (1/327) 0.3 (2/680) 1 (5/502) 0.7 (18/2,464) 1 (10/770) 0.5 (8/1,694)
Recurrence, % 3 (52/1,711) 5 (10/202) 4 (12/327) 2 (15/680) 3 (15/502) 18 (432/2,464) 20 (154/770) 16 (278/1,694)
Improvement of continence, % 71 (391/548) 64 (28/44) 81 (106/131) 76 (134/176) 64 (123/197) 63 (353/562) 74 (188/253) 53 (165/309)
Improvement of constipation, % 57 (237/413) 28 (7/25) 40 (35/87) 68 (95/139) 62 (100/162) 57 (198/305) 58 (51/88) 68 (147/217)
New onset of constipation, % 16 (52/334) 17 (9/54) 22 (39/178) 3 (1/32) 4 (3/70) 0 (0/94) 0 (0/72) 0 (0/22)
Follow up in months (range) 34 (8-74) 30 (24-48) 24 (8-46) 49 (18-74) 36 (12-62) 36 (6-85) 36 (6-85) 34 (13-50)

LSR, laparoscopic suture rectopexy; LPMR, laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy; LVMR, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy; LRR, laparoscopic resection rectopexy; parentheses, number of applicable patients/ population, otherwise indicated.