Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Hum Hypertens. 2020 Jan 30;34(11):787–794. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-0303-y

Table 4.

Examining the association of BB and depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥ 8), according to medication properties, with users of other classes and non-medicated as controls: (n = 14,195).

Exposure (n)a MORb and 95% CI p value
Lipophilic BB (650) 1.39; 1.10–1.75 <0.01
Hydrophilic BB (846) 1.26; 1.03–1.56 0.02
β1-selective (1276) 1.31; 1.10–1.56 <0.01
Non-selective (276) 1.52; 1.08–2.13 0.01
Propranolol (144) 1.56; 0.99–2.48 0.05
Metoprolol (434) 1.40; 1.06–1.84 0.01
Atenolol (794) 1.21; 0.98–1.51 0.07
a

BB’s were classified in subgroups according to properties following Poirier, 2014 [18] as follows:

Lipophilic BB’s: (i.e. pindolol, propranolol, timolol, and metoprolol)

Hydrophilic BB’s: (i.e. atenolol, carteolol, nadolol, sotalol, and labetalol)

Selective BB: (i.e. atenolol, bisoprolol, labetalol, metoproplol, and nebivolol)

N selective BB: (i.e. propranolol, carvedilol, nadolol, timolol, pindolol, and sotalol).

b

Accounting for gender, living status, education, and smoking history (all significant at 0.05 level). Non-significant variables were excluded from multivariable models using a backward elimination method.