Table 2.
Analysis of content of different methods.
| All picked articles | Delphi vote | Editor Majority picks | Editor Sample | Highly cited | SNA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = | 51 | 23 | 156 | 19 | 93 | 55 |
| Economic impact | 43% | 55% | 32% | 38% | 42% | 59% |
| LDCs and development | 42% | 51% | 37% | 37% | 38% | 64% |
| Policy analysis | 40% | 39% | 47% | 49% | 33% | 36% |
| Trade and markets | 24% | 12% | 26% | 30% | 20% | 32% |
| IPRs | 16% | 20% | 11% | 20% | 7% | 9% |
| Consumer response | 14% | 2% | 0% | 13% | 20% | 9% |
| Environment | 12% | 12% | 16% | 10% | 13% | 9% |
| Scientific Studies | 6% | 4% | 5% | 5% | 13% | 0% |
Note: Bold and italicized numbers represent over representations of subject relative to all picked articles.