Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;11:779. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00779

Table 3.

P-values obtained from the repeated-measures ANOVA and its post-hoc analyses, when applied to frequency-domain indices of PRV and HRV.

Index Source ANOVA post-hoc comparisons
BM vs. CE CE vs. CR BM vs. CR
LF (s2) HRV 0.057
Finger PRV 0.008 0.028 0.162 0.077
Toe PRV 0.009 0.010 1.000 0.083
Ear canal PRV 0.622
Earlobe PRV 0.004 0.016 0.352 0.122
HF (s2) HRV 0.024 0.070 0.134 0.059
Finger PRV 0.016 0.058 1.000 0.057
Toe PRV <0.001 <0.001 0.236 0.013
Ear canal PRV 0.057
Earlobe PRV 0.008 0.018 0.458 0.016
TP (s2) HRV 0.031 0.085 0.230 0.061
Finger PRV 0.013 0.047 1.000 0.052
Toe PRV <0.001 <0.001 0.546 0.007
Ear canal PRV 0.581
Earlobe PRV 0.002 0.015 0.459 0.037

Values in red indicate statistical significance (p-value < 0.05). Sphericity corrections using Greenhouse-Geisser correction were applied when Mauchly's test showed statistically significant results, and p-values shown are after these corrections. Normalized frequency-domain indices did not show statistical differences between stages from any of the signals. BM, baseline measurement; CE, cold exposure; CR, cold recovery.