Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 23;14(2):98–104. doi: 10.1159/000499252

Table 2.

Cox proportional-hazards regression: uni- and multi-variate analysis of DFS

Variable (comparator) DFS, Cox proportional hazard regression
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
Age (> 60 vs. ≤ 60 years) 1.19 (0.77–1.84) 0.4268
Sex (male vs. female) 1.34 (0.83–2.16) 0.2266
ECOG-PS (≥ 2 vs. 0–1) 0.85 (0.31–2.34) 0.7620
Side (left)
 Right 0.79 (0.50–1.26) 0.3301 0.97 (0.58–1.61) 0.9197
 Bilateral 9.5 (2.78–32.7) 0.0003 6.59 (1.81–23.9) 0.0041
Histology (clear cell)
 Papillary/chromophobe 0.58 (0.23–1.46) 0.2549 0.50 (0.19–1.29) 0.1530
 Others 2.44 (1.24–4.81) 0.0094 1.59 (0.74–3.39) 0.2277
 Fuhrman grade (3–4 vs. 1–2) 2.09 (1.34–3.26) 0.0011 2.21 (1.39–3.51) 0.0008
 T (3b–4 vs. 1–3a) 1.65 (1.01–2.69) 0.0437 1.73 (1.04–2.87) 0.0324
 N (1–2 vs. 0–x) 3.16 (1.68–5.92) 0.0003 2.23 (1.07–4.63) 0.0303