Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;4(14):3224–3233. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001927

Table 3.

Association of most significant GWAS variants per LD block with NRM and RM

Chr Gene SNP Alleles* End point Genome Model MAF Discovery results Replication results
P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) Power, %
6 MIR548A1HG rs9350085 C/T NRM Recipient Allelic 0.37 7.7E−07 1.29 (1.2-1.4) .65 0.97 (0.9-1.1) 100
6 LOC105377999 rs9492413 C/T NRM Donor Allelic 0.19 9.8E−07 1.35 (1.2-1.5) .86 0.99 (0.9-1.1) 100
12 none rs11451044 CA/C NRM Donor Allelic 0.45 5.8E−07 1.28 (1.2-1.4) 1.00 1.00 (0.9-1.1) 100
4 GBA3 rs114484584 C/T RM Recipient Allelic 0.02 2.4E−07 2.46 (1.8-3.3) .23 0.63 (0.3-1.4) 16
11 CCDC81 rs148290359 C/T RM Recipient Allelic 0.02 2.3E−07 0.14 (0.04-0.4) .46 1.23 (0.7-2.1) 33
7 none rs117446118 G/A RM Donor Allelic 0.02 8.1E−07 2.91 (2.0-4.2) .10 0.60 (0.3-1.2) 22
9 ADAMTSL1 rs60125430 C/T RM Donor Allelic 0.09 4.6E−08 1.74 (1.4-2.1) .37 1.15 (0.9-1.5) 77
*

Plus strand major/minor alleles.

MAF in the samples used for the test.

Post hoc power estimates to detect an HR ≥1.5 or ≤0.67 at a 2-sided significance level of .05 were based on the estimated standard error of the log HR in the replication cohort.