Table 1. Characteristics of Included Studies.
Study | Index prognostic factor | Design, setting, and population | Sampling technique (dates of melanoma diagnosis) | Participants by AJCC stage, No. (%) | Male, No. (%) | Age, median, y (follow-up duration, median, y) | Breslow thickness, median, mm | Ulceration, No. (%) | Anatomical sites, No. (%) | Follow-up and imaging protocol | Outcomes blinded to GEP result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hsueh et al,25 2017 (US) | DecisionDx-Melanoma (Castle Biosciences Inc [which also provided funding]) | Observational, prospective registry, multicenter (n = 11); hospital and community based; patients with resected melanoma with a successful GEP resulta | Nonprobability, convenience (NR) | 209 (66) Stage I; 73 (23) stage II; 36 (11) stage III | 176 (55) | 58 (1.5 Without event and 1 with event) | 1.2 | Present: 58 (18); unknown: 26 (8) | Head/neck: 58 (18); trunk: 86 (27); extremity: 178 (55) | Nob | Nob |
Greenhaw et al,29 2018 (US) | DecisionDx-Melanoma (Castle Biosciences Inc; funded by Zitelli and Brodland, PCc) | Observational, mixed retrospective and prospective cohorts; single center, community based; patients with resected melanoma with previous GEP testing performed as part of clinical care and patients with melanoma with known metastatic disease who subsequently underwent GEP testing | Nonprobability, convenience (NR) | 219 (86) Stage I; 37 (14) stage II | 160 (63) | 68 For class 1 and 72 for class 2 (1.9 [mean]) | 0.4 (Class 1); 2 (class 2) | Present: 26 (10); unknown: 2 (1) | NR | Retrospective cohort: non–rule based; prospective cohort: rule based by GEP test scorec | Noc |
Zager et al,27 2018 (US) | DecisionDx-Melanoma (Castle Biosciences Inc [which also provided funding]) | Observational, retrospective cohort of archival specimens; multicenter (n = 16), hospital and community based; patients with resected stage I-III melanoma with minimum of 5 y of follow-up if no recurrence | Nonprobability, convenience (2000-2014) | 264 (50) Stage I; 93 (18) stage II; 166 (32) stage III | NR | 59 (7.5 Without event; 1.2 with event) | 1.2; Unknown in 4 (1%) | Present: 133 (26); unknown: 81 (15) | NR | No | Yes |
Keller et al,26 2019 (US) | DecisionDx-Melanoma (Castle Biosciences Inc, funded by St. Louis University Cancer Center) | Observational, prospective cohort; single center, hospital based; patients with melanoma undergoing WLE and SLN biopsya | Nonprobability, convenience (2013-2015) | 96 (60) Stage I; 40 (25) stage II; 23 (15) stage III | 98 (62) | 59 (3.5) | 1.4 | Present: 38 (24) | Head/neck: 26 (16); trunk: 68 (43); extremity: 65 (41) | Rule based by stage of disease | No |
Podlipnik et al,28 2019 (Spain) | DecisionDx-Melanoma (Castle Biosciences Inc [which also provided funding]) | Observational, prospective cohort; multicenter (n = 5), hospital based; patients with resected stage IB-II melanoma (85% underwent SLN biopsy)d | Nonprobability, convenience (2015-2016)d | 62 (72) Stage IB or IIA; 24 (28) stage IIB or C | 40 (47) | 59 (2.2) | 2.5 (Mean) | Present: 26 (30) | Head/neck: 11 (13); trunk: 37 (43); legs: 21 (24); arms: 12 (14); acral: 5 (6) | Nod | Nod |
Koelblinger et al,31 2018 (Germany) | MelaGenix (NeraCare GmbH [funding not reported]) | Observational, case-control (retrospective); hospital based; patients with melanoma ≤1 mm with recurrence (cases) or disease free (controls) | NR (NR) | 88 (100) Stage I | NR | NR (3.7) | 0.8 (Cases); 0.6 (controls) | NR | NR | NR | Yes |
Amaral et al,30 2020 (Germany) | MelaGenix (NeraCare GmbH [which also provided funding along with Eberhard-Karls University of Tuebingen])e | Observational, retrospective analysis of archival registry; single center, hospital based; patients with resected stage II melanoma with available tissue (80% underwent SLN biopsy) | Nonprobability, consecutive (2000-2016)e | 245 (100) Stage II | 134 (55) | 70 (3.4) | 3.0 | Present: 142 (58) | NR | Rule based by stage of diseasee | Yese |
Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; GEP, gene expression profile; NR, not reported; SLN, sentinel lymph node; WLE, wide local excision.
There were partially overlapping patient populations (ie, a proportion of patients described by Keller et al26 are included in the study by Hsueh et al25).
Date of email communication with study author was December 11, 2019.
Date of email communication with study author was January 21, 2020.
Dates of email communication with study author were December 13, 2019; and January 22, 2020; and February 4, 2020.
Date of email communication with study author was January 22, 2020.