Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 11;11(18):5395–5402. doi: 10.7150/jca.41100

Table 3.

Evaluation of the detection value of L1CAM in the diagnosis of GC and EJA

Group AUC (95%CI) Sensitivity Specificity FPR FNR PPV NPV PLR NLR
All-stage
GC vs. NC 0.769 (0.715-0.823) 83.1% 62.2% 37.8% 16.9% 68.7% 78.6% 2.20 0.27
EJA vs. NC 0.672 (0.590-0.755) 66.1% 62.2% 37.8% 33.9% 41.1% 82.1% 1.75 0.55
GC+EJA vs. NC 0.742 (0.689-0.794) 78.3% 64.2% 35.8% 21.7% 74.3% 67.2% 2.07 0.35
Early-stage
GC vs. NC 0.681 (0.596-0.766) 76.6% 62.2% 37.8% 23.4% 39.1% 89.3% 2.02 0.38
EJA vs. NC 0.674 (0.528-0.820) 69.2% 62.2% 37.8% 30.8% 13.8% 95.8% 1.83 0.49
GC+EJA vs. NC 0.679 (0.601-0.758) 75.0% 62.2% 37.8% 25.0% 44.6% 86.0% 1.98 0.40

AUC, area under the curve; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; GC: gastric cancer; EJA: esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas; NC, normal controls; FNR, false negative rate; FPR, false positive rate; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.