Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;30(9):5088–5106. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa103

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Behavioral results. (A) EEG setup. Participant’s viewed visual stimuli flash at different distances, while on given trials they simultaneously were given tactile stimulation on the hand. (B) Tactile RT (y-axis) as a function of visuo-tactile distance (x-axis). Dots illustrate the group average RT, while error bars illustrate ±1 SEM. Dashed vertical line is the mean central point of the sigmoidal function describing tactile RTs as a function of visuo-tactile distance, and gray shaded area around the vertical line is the uncertainty (SEM) associated with the central point estimate. (C) Tactile RT as a function of visuo-tactile distance (x-axis) and whether the precedent trial (i.e., t − 1) was one presenting a larger (blue) or smaller (red) visuo-tactile spatial disparity. The rest of conventions as in left panel. (D) Correlation between the degrees to which a particular participant’s PPS recalibrated as a function of the previous trial (x-axis) and parameter b in equation (1) (y-axis) regardless of the nature of the previous trial.