Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;10:12759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69371-7

Table 1.

Comparison between input and recovered parameters for the mass distributions of Fig. 2.

TiO2 phase Input Recovered
 ⟨  d ⟩ m (nm) σm (nm) cm (%)  ⟨ d ⟩m (nm) σm (nm) cm (%)
Anatase 4.80 1.20 0.173 4.81 1.22 0.173
Rutile 8.23 2.74 0.291 8.23 2.76 0.291
Brookite 11.25 2.25 0.536 11.25 2.31 0.537
Background (a.u.) 1 0.998