Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;10:12759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69371-7

Table 4.

Comparison between DEBUSSY and Inversion results for the Titania data of Fig. 5.

Phase Inversion (GOF = 18.8) DEBUSSY (GOF = 15.3)
 < d > m (nm) σm (nm) cm (%)  < d > m (nm) σm (nm) cm (%)
Anatase 22.7 9.93 0.87 23.2 10.2 0.88
Rutile 36.7 25.5 0.13 34.6 19.3 0.12