Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;46(3):314–326. doi: 10.1037/xan0000258

Table 1. Design of Experiments 1 and 2.

Condition Sample 1 ISI Sample 2 RI Test SGP? RGP? Net bias?
Note. RR = relative recency; OIP = object-in-place; ISI = inter-sample interval; SGP = self-generated priming; RGP = retrieval-generated priming. A, B, C, and D denote target images, presented to participants on a computer display. For Experiment 1, x, y were contextual stimuli, and in all conditions A is presented in the first sample phase, and B in the second. In the xAB and yAB conditions x is presented with A, and y with B, during the sample phases. In all conditions, participants are tested with AB; in the xAB condition x is also present at test, while y is present in the yAB condition. In Experiment 2 in the RR condition participants exposed to AB followed by CD and then tested with ABCD; all images are tested in their preexposure locations. In the OIP condition participants are exposed twice to BACD and at test one pair of images, in the example above AB, changes location. The RR + OIP and RR − OIP conditions are identical to the RR condition, except that the first- or second-presented pair of images change location for RR + OIP and RR – OIP, respectively. The “SGP?” and “RGP?” columns specify the images that will be viewed less according to these respective mechanisms, and the resultant predictions of test performance is in the “Net bias?” column.
Experiment 1
RR A .5, 1, 2 s B .5, 1, 2 s A B B A > B
RR + OIP x A y B y A B B B A >> B
RR − OIP x A y B x A B B A AB
Experiment 2
RR A B 1 s 1, 10 s A B A B A B > C D
C D C D C D C D
OIP B A B A A B A B > C D
C D C D C D C D
RR + OIP B A A B >> C D
C D C D C D
RR − OIP A B A B A BC D
D C A C D