Table 3.
Exemplar neurobehavioral studies.
| Reference | Outcome measures | Non-drinker stratificationa | Sex-stratified risk analysisb | Dose ranges and definitions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reas, Laughlin, Kritz-Silverstein, Barrett-Connor, and McEvoy (2016) | Cognitive function | Yes | No | <14g/<28g/day for women/men; 14/28 to <42/<56g/day; >42/>56g/dayc | Observed positive linear relationships between executive function and both amount and frequency of consumption, but U-shaped functions for memory, with the greatest advantages among moderate and infrequent (1–2 days/week) drinkers |
| Herring and Paulson (2018) | Cognitive function; Cognitive decline |
No | No | 14–196g/week | Moderate drinking significantly associated with better cognitive performance across a variety of tasks/domains, but did not have a significant effect on performance decline |
| Hogenkamp et al. (2014) | Cognitive function; Cognitive decline |
No | Male sample | 12 g/day; 24g/day; ≥36g/day |
Moderate consumption associated with performance advantage in set-shifting/executive function task, but not on rates of change in performance over 7-year period |
| Neafsey and Collins (2011) | Dementia; Cognitive decline (Meta-analysis) | Mixed | Mixed | “Light to moderate” (≤1/≤2 drinks/day for women/men); “Heavy” (>3–4 drinks/day)d | Average RR for cognitive risk (dementia/impairment) for moderate drinking was 0.77. Benefit applied to all forms of dementia/impairment, but not rate of cognitive decline |
| Peters et al. (2008) | Dementia; Cognitive decline (Meta-analysis) | No | No | Specific categories not established | Conclude light-to-moderate drinking may be protective against dementia (RR: 0.63) and Alzheimer’s (RR: 0.57) but not vascular dementia or cognitive decline |
| Downer et al. (2015) | Episodic memory; Hippocampal volume |
No | No | “Light” (1–6 drinks/week); “Moderate” (7–14/week); “heavy” (15–34/week)d | Moderate drinking during late life associated with larger hippocampal volumes; Light, but not moderate consumption associated with improvements in episodic memory which were accounted for by hippocampal volume |
| Topiwala et al. (2017) | Cognitive decline; Hippocampal volume |
No | Yes | “Light” (8–56 g/week) “Moderate” (56–112/168 g/week for women/men) “Unsafe” (112/168 +/week) | 112–168g/week associated with over three times the odds for hippocampal atrophy. No associations between drinking and cognitive decline |
| McEvoy et al. (2018) | White matter integrity | Yes | Male Sample | “Very Light” (1–3 drinks/2 weeks); “Light” (4–8/2 weeks); “Moderate” (9–28/2 weeks); “Heavier” (>28/2 weeks)d | U-shaped dose-response function detected for alcohol and fractional anisotropy (FA) measures across multiple tracts, with FA increases peaking at moderate levels |
| Wardzala et al. (2018) | Cognitive decline | No | Yes | “Rare/never” (<14g/week); “Moderate” (<98/196 g/week. for women/men); “Heavy” (>98/196 g/week) | Analyzed rates of decline across a battery of neuropsychological tests and global measures of impairment; Sex-stratified analyses revealed reduced rates of memory decline in moderate drinking women, but measures of global impairment in men |
Reflects whether lifetime abstainers were employed as a reference group. “Mixed” indicates this separation occurred in some, but not all analyses.
Reflects whether dose-response risk functions were individuated for men and women.
1.25oz liquor (~12g alcohol) used to define “1 drink”; conversion to 14g/drink may have overestimated consumption.
Insufficient information to convert “drinks” to grams.