Abstract
Precise regulation of signal transduction pathways is crucial for normal animal development and for maintaining cellular and tissue homeostasis in adults. The Wnt/Frizzled-mediated signaling includes canonical and non-canonical signal transduction pathways. Upregulation or downregulation of the canonical Wnt signaling (or the Wnt/β-Catenin signal transduction) leads to a variety of human diseases, including cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, skin and bone diseases, and heart deficiencies. Therefore, Wnt/β-Catenin signal transduction is a potential clinical target for the treatment of not only human cancers but also some other human chronic diseases. Here, some recent results including those from my laboratory highlighting the role of Wnt/β-Catenin signal transduction in human cancers will be reviewed. After a brief overview on canonical Wnt signaling and introducing some critical β-Catenin/TCF-target genes, the interaction of canonical Wnt signaling with some common human cancers will be discussed. In the end, the different segments of the aforesaid signaling pathway, which have been considered as targets for clinical purposes, will be scrutinized.
Key Words: β-catenin, Human cancers, Wnt signaling
INTRODUCTION
The Wnt/Frizzled-mediated signal transduction includes several signaling pathways, which have collectively been divided into two groups of biological processes based on the involvement of the β-Catenin protein[1 ▶,2 ▶]. The original model for Wnt signaling pathway had a central component called β-Catenin, the homolog of Armadillo protein in Drosophila[3 ▶,4 ▶]. Today, this signaling pathway has been named “the canonical Wnt signaling” or “the Wnt/β-Catenin” pathway[5 ▶-7 ▶]. For years, it has been thought that Wnt signaling is only one pathway (Fig. 1). Now, we have learned that the signals transmitted through the Wnts and their cognate receptors (Frizzled proteins) lead to at least three important biological processes, which two of them apparently are not directly dependent on β-Catenin protein[1 ▶,2 ▶] (Fig. 2). These two signaling pathways are called “non-canonical”. This article mainly discusses the canonical Wnt signaling and its potential role in human cancers. However, it is worth mentioning that the deregulation of the non-canonical Wnt pathways also occurs in human malignancies, and interestingly, based on recent results the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways have an important function in the survival, invasion, and metastasis of some human cancers[7 ▶-9 ▶].
Fig. 1.
(A) The original model for Wg signaling in Drosophila, the core of the current model for the canonical Wnt signal transduction (the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway). (B) The simplified model for the canonical Wnt signalling in vertebrates. In the absence of the Wnt ligands, the destruction protein complex (including APC, Axin, GSK-3β, CK1, β-Trcp, and β-Catenin) works in favour of β-Catenin phosphorylation and its subsequent ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis (u letters on β-Catenin in the destruction complex). β-Catenin phosphorylation occurs at some serine and threonine residues located at amino-terminal segment of the protein (p letters on β-Catenin in the destruction complex). The protein kinases, GSK-3β and CK1, are responsible for the phosphorylation of β-Catenin in the destruction complex. In the presence of the Wnt proteins and activation of the Frizzled receptors, some components of the destruction complex, including Axin and GSK-3β, are recruited to the cell membrane via Dvl protein and form a protein complex, called “signalosome”.[23] Phosphorylation of LRP co-receptor plays an important role in formation and stabilization of signalosome. Dissociation of the destruction complex leads to a significant decrease in β-Catenin phosphorylation; therefore, this protein accumulates in the cell. Increase in β-Catenin cellular levels may lead to its nuclear translocation and its interaction with the TCF/Lef transcription factors. Transcriptional regulation of some very important cellular genes appears to be the final outcome of β-Catenin nuclear translocation. NM, nuclear membrane; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; Axin, axis inhibitor; CK1, casein kinase 1; GSK-3β, glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta; Lef, lymphoid enhancer factor; LRP5/6, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6; β-TrCP, beta-transducin repeat containing protein; TCF, T-cell factor
Fig. 2.
Two well-known non-canonical Wnt signalling pathways, including Wnt/Ca2+ (right) and Wnt/PCP (left). There are results supporting that both pathways are dependent on heterotrimeric G-protein signaling[20,21]. While LRP5/6 appears to work specifically for canonical Wnt signaling (Fig. 1), the co-receptors for non-canonical Wnt pathways belong to the family of RTKs (ROR1/2 and RYK). The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway functions through the G-proteins that activate certain isoforms of the enzyme, PLC. Activation of PLC converts the phospholipid, PIP2, to DAG and IP3, which are two very important cellular second messengers. DAG is a direct activator of PKC, a multifunctional protein kinase in the cell, involved in the regulation of several cellular processes. IP3, on the other hand, interacts with its receptors on endoplasmic reticulum and leads to the intracellular release of calcium. Calcium is a co-factor for the activity of many important cellular proteins, including PKC, CamKII (Ca²/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II), and Calcineurin. As a protein phosphatase, Calcineurin can activate some transcription factors, including NFAT and therefore take part in the regulation of transcription of some important cellular genes. The other non-canonical Wnt signaling indicated in the Figure is a critical pathway involved in determining PCP. Wnt/Frizzled-mediated activation of this pathway with the help of the co-receptors (ROR2/RYK) signals through Dvl and heterotrimeric G-proteins (not shown in the Figure) to activate small GTPases like RhoA and Rac1. Activation of these small GTPases at least has two biological outcomes, reorganization of cell cytoskeleton and transcriptional regulation of some very important cellular genes mediated by transcription factors like c-Jun and AP1, a heterodimer of c-Jun and c-Fos transcription factors. DAAM1, disheveled-associated activator of morphogenesis 1; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ROCK, Rho-associated protein kinase; PCP, planar cell polarity; PLC, phospholipase C; DAG, diacyl glycerol; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T-cells; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate; IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
The first indication of the interaction between Wnt signaling pathways and cancer was discovered in Harold Varmus’s laboratory where it was found that the retroviral integration-mediated activation of a gene called int1 led to mammary tumor formation in mice[10 ▶,11 ▶]. The gene int1 was detected to be very similar to the Drosophila segment polarity gene, wingless. Then scientists combined the names of these two genes and chose wnt1 as the first vertebrate homolog of wingless. Human genome encodes 19 different Wnt proteins and 10 different Frizzled receptors[12 ▶]. Although it has been reported that some of these proteins work specifically for either canonical or non-canonical Wnt signaling, there are some results showing that a number of Wnt proteins (like Wnt-5a) can activate both types of Wnt pathways[13 ▶]. The specificity of the signals via Wnt proteins probably depends on many proteins, which regulate canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways, especially the regulators at upstream levels. Both heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors and Frizzleds demonstrate a high level of structural similarities as they contain seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains[14 ▶]. There is sufficient evidence for the involvement of G-proteins in the regulation of both canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways[15 ▶-22 ▶]. The regulatory role of heterotrimeric G-proteins can probably help us to find out more about the specificity of the signals through Wnt/Frizzled proteins. Also, this very important discovery that Frizzled proteins are not the only receptors for Wnt ligands adds another level of complexity to the Wnt-mediated signaling pathways. LRP5/6 and the receptor tyrosine kinases, ROR/RYK, are the known co-receptors for canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways, respectively[5 ▶,6 ▶].
The current model for the canonical Wnt signaling
According to the present model, in the absence of the Wnt ligands, a destruction protein complex, including APC, Axin, GSK-3β, CK1, and β-TrCP, maintains cellular β-Catenin protein at physiological levels[5 ▶,6 ▶,23 ▶]. This behavior is due to the phosphorylation of β-Catenin by CK1 and GSK-3β at serine and threonine residues located within the amino terminal of the protein (encoded by exon 3 of CTNNB1, the β-Catenin-encoding gene). This phosphorylation leads to
ubiquitination and proteasome degradation of β-Catenin. Upon the interaction of the Wnt proteins to their receptors (Frizzled and LRP5/6), the destruction complex dissociates (at least partially), and a new protein complex forms at the cell membrane (called signalosome), which contains some of the components of the destruction complex[23 ▶]. Formation of signalosome results in a decrease in β-Catenin phosphorylation, followed by the cellular accumulation of this protein (Fig. 2).
A brief discussion of some Wnt/β-Catenin target genes
Wnt/β-Catenin target gene promoters contain WREs as a part of their regulatory sequences[24 ▶]. WREs are the binding sites for the β-Catenin/TCF complex[24 ▶]. Activation of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling either increases or decreases the expression of some cellular genes. The number of genes regulated by the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling is probably cell context-dependent. In normal human cells, especially epithelial tissues, the activity of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling is extremely low (due to very low levels of cytoplasmic β-Catenin), and higher activation of this signaling pathway is limited to the situations like tissue regeneration and human malignancies[25 ▶,26 ▶].
CCND1
This gene encodes Cyclin D1, one of the critical components of the G1-S transition of cell cycle in all animal cells[27 ▶,28 ▶]. Cyclin D1 has been considered as R factor[27 ▶]. The cellular concentration of R factor should reach a certain level before the progression of cell cycle from G1 phase to S phase. Cyclin D1 mainly interacts with the G1-S transition protein kinases, CDK4 and CDK6. Activation of these two protein kinases is required to progress cell cycle toward the S phase[27 ▶,28 ▶]. Deregulation of cell cycle is a feature of nearly all human cancers[27 ▶,28 ▶]. Cancer cells use several mechanisms to deregulate the cell cycle. Increase in CCND1 gene expression and/or protein stabilization is among these mechanisms. The mitogenic signals via receptor tyrosine kinases together with PI3-kinase/AKT signaling are the most known pathways to enhance gene expression and protein stability of Cyclin D1[29 ▶]. In addition, the gene-encoding Cyclin D1 is a target of the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway. Therefore, cancer cells with upregulated Wnt/β-Catenin signaling are expected to have higher levels of Cyclin D1 protein and therefore higher cell proliferation rate.
c-MYC
This gene is one of the most potent cellular proto-oncogenes and encodes c-Myc protein. c-Myc is a transcription factor that binds to DNA (via helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper domains) and regulates the expression of the genes involved in many cellular functions, including cell proliferation and DNA replication[30 ▶-33 ▶]. c-Myc can heterodimerize with other transcription factors like Max to increase the number of the target genes. It is estimated that c-Myc is involved in the expression of more than 15% of cellular genes supporting the role of this protein in many cellular functions[33 ▶]. c-Myc binds to the enhancer box sequences on DNA, and by recruiting important proteins like histone acetyltransferases, it regulates gene expression[32 ▶,33 ▶]. c-Myc activates cell growth by upregulating the expression of ribosomal RNAs and proteins and also by decreasing the expression of the genes encoding pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins[30 ▶,32 ▶]. c-Myc is also required for cancer cell metabolism and stemness of cancer stem cells[30 ▶,32 ▶]. Increase in c-Myc expression and activity has been observed in a wide range of human cancers[30 ▶-33 ▶]. In addition to the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway, some other mitogenic signals (like epidermal growth factor receptor and sonic hedgehog pathways) can enhance the c-Myc expression. In normal cells, the mRNA and protein levels of c-Myc are low, and this is due to the fact that c-Myc mRNA and protein are unstable[30 ▶]. Since the overexpression of c-Myc in normal cells can lead to oncogenic shock and induce apoptosis, cancer cells should probably obtain new features to tolerate higher levels of c-Myc activation.
c-JUN
The product of this gene is also a transcription factor[34 ▶]. c-Jun can heterodimerize with c-Fos to form a new transcription factor called AP1[34 ▶,35 ▶]. The expression and function of c-Jun are dependent on several signaling pathways mediated by some growth factors, pre-inflammatory signals, oxidative stress, and ultraviolet radiation[35 ▶]. The promoter region of c-JUN is responsive to the combinatorial transcription factor, AP1, which can be considered as a positive feedback for c-Jun expression[35 ▶]. One of the target genes of c-Jun is CCND1, which encodes Cyclin-D1[34 ▶]. Since CCND1 is also a direct target of the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway, it can be concluded that Wnt/β-Catenin signaling has a powerful cell proliferation effect. A target gene that its expression is negatively affected by AP1 is TP53, the gene encoding the tumor suppressor, p53[36 ▶]. p53 is a known mediator of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Therefore, it appears that c-Jun not only induces cell proliferation but also can make cells resistant to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of p53. These features of c-Jun may have a significant role in tumor growth and tumor resistance to chemotherapy.
MMP7
This gene encodes MMP7, which belongs to the family of matrix metalloproteinases and is involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix. In normal situations, these proteins have an important role in embryogenesis, wound healing, and tissue regeneration[37 ▶]. However, deregulated expression and/or function of MMPs (including MMP7) can lead to angiogenesis, cancer invasion, and metastasis[37 ▶]. MMP7 is normally translated as a pro-enzyme (28 kDa), which is then processed to the active form of MMP7 (19 kDa). It has been demonstrated that the overexpression of MMP7 enhances cancer invasion and metastasis[37 ▶-39 ▶]. Immunohistochemistry experiments have also indicated that cancer cells compared to the corresponding normal cells may express higher levels of MMP7 protein[40 ▶].
VEGF
This gene encodes VEGF protein, which was originally identified as a hormone for growth and proliferation of endothelial cells[41 ▶]. Upregulation of this protein is very important for tumor growth and angiogenesis[42]. During animal development, VEGF stimulates embryonic vascular formation, and postnatally, this protein acts in neo-vascularization upon injuries or blockade of veins or capillaries[41 ▶,42 ▶]. It has also been demonstrated that VEGF enhances vascular permeability[41 ▶]. The function of this protein in cancer growth has drawn attention since without this protein the tumors cannot grow beyond a certain size. It has been shown that about 50% of colorectal cancer tissues express higher levels of VEGF protein compared to the corresponding normal cells[43 ▶]. Moreover, the expression of VEGF in colorectal tumor indicates poor prognosis and poor response to the therapy[43 ▶]. VEGF receptor belongs to the family of receptor tyrosine kinases, which are known as potent transducers of mitogenic signals. One of the inducers of VEGF expression and release is hypoxia[42 ▶]. Hypoxia increases the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor, a transcription factor whose activity can lead to VEGF release and its binding to the receptor[42 ▶]. The above information reveals that VEGF expression by Wnt/β-Catenin signaling can have an important role in tumor growth, tumor angiogenesis, and tumor invasion.
FGF18
This gene encodes FGF18 protein, which is an important cellular mitogenic growth factor[44]. FGF18 is involved in animal development and tissue regeneration by regulating different cellular functions, including growth, proliferation, and survival[44 ▶]. When deregulated, FGF18 promotes cancer growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis[45 ▶]. The receptor for FGF18 is FGFR3, a member of the family of mitogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, which functions through Ras and Map kinases[44 ▶]. It is worth mentioning that FGF family of growth factors include at least 22 members (FGF1-FGF22), which some of them are preferentially expressed during embryonic development[46 ▶]. One of the known functions of FGF18 is growth and development of cartilage and bone during embryogenesis and post-embryonic development[44 ▶,45 ▶]. In mice, overexpression of FGF18 leads to cartilage thickness[47 ▶]. FGF18 null mice die very early after birth, probably due to the deformation of the ribs[47 ▶]. Although FGF18 is a potent mitogen for osteoblasts and chondrocytes, this protein can also enhance the growth and proliferation of other cells, including neurons, intestine, and liver cells[46 ▶]. It has been reported that there is a positive association between FGF18 expression and development of some human cancers, including colon cancer[45 ▶]. Interestingly, it has been observed that in slow proliferating colon cancer cell lines (like Caco-2 and LT-97), addition of FGF18 to the cell culture can elevate cell proliferation[45 ▶].
c-MET
The product of this gene, c-Met, which has also been called “HGFR” is a receptor tyrosine kinase[48 ▶]. c-Met is a key player in animal development, and therefore, homozygous deletion of c-Met gene, similar to the gene encoding the c-Met ligand (HGF), is embryonically lethal in mice[48 ▶,49 ▶]. HGF is mainly expressed by mesenchymal cells, while c-Met (HGFR) is normally expressed by epithelial cells, which signifies that epithelial cells expressing c-Met can respond to paracrine signals from mesenchymal cells expressing HGF[49 ▶]. As mentioned above, c-Met is a member of the RTK family, and therefore it can potentially be involved in several biological activities. It has been displayed that upon damage to tissues like liver, kidney, and heart, the expression of c-Met in these tissues increases, suggesting that this protein has a positive role in tissue repair[48 ▶,49 ▶]. In addition to the known components of the RTK signaling, some other important signaling molecules such as the intracellular tyrosine kinase, Src, the regulatory subunit of PI3-Kiase (p85 protein), Phosphlipase Cβ, Ship1, and STAT3 can be activated by c-Met[48 ▶]. Also, the c-Met-mediated signaling can activate gene expression that some of the target genes encode matrix metalloproteinases[50 ▶]. Regarding the interaction with human cancers, c-Met has been considered a potent oncogene involved in cancer cell growth, invasion, and metastasis[48 ▶,49 ▶]. Induction of EMT is one of the mechanisms of c-Met-mediated cancer cell invasion[49 ▶,50 ▶]. Genetic mutations and chromosomal rearrangements can lead to the upregulation of c-Met in human cancers[48 ▶,50 ▶]. The genes encoding c-Met and its ligand (HGF) are located on chromosome 7, and trisomy of this chromosome has been observed in most cases of capillary renal carcinoma[51 ▶]. In addition, duplication of c-MET gene has been reported in familial forms of renal carcinoma. Studies have also indicated that the expression of c-Met and its ligand is higher in colorectal cancer tissues than that of these proteins in the corresponding normal mucosa, and this increase is normally accompanied with cancer invasion, metastasis, and patient poor prognosis[51 ▶,52 ▶]. In fact, c-Met has been considered as a potential clinical target for the treatment of colorectal cancer[52 ▶].
TERT
TERT is an important Wnt/β-Catenin target gene and encodes the enzyme Telomerase, a significant marker of proliferating cells, including stem cells[53 ▶]. Many non-proliferative somatic cells in adults do not express TERT and may remain Telomerase-negative until the end of their lifespan[53 ▶,54 ▶]. Although Telomerase is primarily known as an enzyme adding telomere repeats to the chromosome ends during chromosome replication, further studies have shown that Telomerase is a multi-functional protein and positively regulates cell proliferation[54,55]. Telomerase also supports chromosomal stability in cells having short telomeres[53 ▶,54 ▶]. Many carcinomas do not express Telomerase at early stages, likely because these tumor cells need genomic instability to progress[55 ▶]. However, many of these cancers re-express Telomerase at late stages, the time when further chromosomal instability may lead to cancer cell death[53 ▶,55 ▶]. Telomerase has been considered as a therapeutic target for the late stages of carcinogenesis or for the tumors originating from Telomerase-positive cells like leukemia and lymphoma[55 ▶].
A conclusion on the expression of the discussed genes
It definitely cannot be expected that β-Catenin has ability to regulate all its target genes in a specific colon cancer patient or in a cell line in which β-Catenin has been overexpressed. The correct number of genes, which are regulated by the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway, is most likely dependent on the cell context[56 ▶]. Activation of the canonical Wnt signaling (or the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway) occurs in more than 85% of colon cancer cases in which this signaling pathway is involved in tumor formation and progression[5 ▶-8 ▶]. The transcriptional activities of β-Catenin protein are a hallmark of deregulation of this signaling pathway in colon cancer and some other malignancies. We have learned that each one of the target genes (some of them mentioned above) may produce a multi-functional protein, which can greatly influence cellular activities, including growth, proliferation, survival, polarity, cytoskeleton organization, and movement. Therefore, we can easily conclude that the deregulation of the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling in cells (like colon epithelial cells) can potentially lead to the formation and progression of neoplastic cells. It is worth mentioning that the transcription of some of the target genes decreases upon the activation of the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling. A good example is CDH1, which encodes E-Cadherin, a true marker of epithelial cells[25 ▶,26 ▶,57 ▶]. Decrease in E-Cadherin expression can induce EMT, which may activate a Wnt-independent β-Catenin signaling[25 ▶,26 ▶,57 ▶]. Another mechanism to reduce the expression of CDH1 by Wnt/β-Catenin is the activation of a gene called SNAI1, encoding a transcription factor (Snail), which negatively regulates the transcription of CDH1[25 ▶,58 ▶].
β-Catenin and human cancers
Before discussing human cancers, which are dependent on β-Catenin deregulation, it is interesting to know that different tumors may use various mechanisms to upregulate β-Catenin signaling. We know that β-Catenin cellular accumulation and its transcriptional activities are not due to only activation of the canonical Wnt pathway. The mitogenic and surviving signals through RTKs and PI3-Kinas/AKT can also upregulate β-Catenin activity via phosphorylation (at serine 9) and inactivation of GSK-3β[15 ▶,59 ▶] and/or the induction of EMT. We and others have also suggested that the activation of some classes of heterotrimeric G-proteins (like Gαq signaling) can cause cellular accumulation of β-Catenin and its transcriptional activities[15 ▶,16 ▶,18 ▶,21 ▶]. An important question is whether the β-Catenin proteins activated by these signaling pathways functionally behave similarly, or there are different species of this protein that each tumor is dependent on one or two of them. It is also important to consider that some tumors may use two or more components of Wnt signaling pathway to perhaps amplify β-Catenin activation. An example is the colon cancer cell line, HCT-116, which carries both β-Catenin-activating gene mutations together with epigenetic silencing of the sFRP encoding gene[60 ▶,61 ▶]. Based on the above information, it appears that β-Catenin deregulation occurs in many human cancers[5 ▶-9 ▶], and the examples below are just representatives of those tumors.
Colon cancer
Colon cancer is perhaps the best example of the interaction between Wnt/β-Catenin signaling and human cancers and has very well been investigated over the decades[5 ▶-8 ▶]. All familial adenomatous polyposis patients and more than 85% of the sporadic cases of colon cancer carry genetic mutations in the APC gene, resulting in the complete or partial inactivation of the APC protein[62 ▶,63 ▶]. During Wnt/β-Catenin signal transduction, APC protein functions as a regulator and a large scaffold protein to maintain β-Catenin protein levels at physiological concentrations. Upon the inactivation of APC in colon epithelial cells, β-Catenin accumulates in the cell. This cellular accumulation of β-Catenin may result in its nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity of this protein, which appears to be the main cause of colon cancer initiation[62 ▶,63 ▶]. Interestingly, the remaining cases (nearly 15%) of colon cancer, which lack APC mutations, carry genetic or epigenetic changes in some other components of the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway (like the genes encoding Axin, β-Catenin, and sFRP)[60 ▶-63 ▶]. Even in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer patients, which initially carry genetic mutations in the genes encoding the proteins of the mismatch DNA repair system, genetic mutations (point mutations) in the β-Catenin-encoding gene (CTNNB1) is very common at later stages[64 ▶]. β-Catenin mutations normally affect the N-terminal of the protein replacing the GSK-3β or Casein kinase phosphorylation sites[64 ▶]. As mentioned above, deregulation of the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway is an early event in colon cancer. Clinically, this is a very important issue because targeting the biological pathways involved in the initiation of tumorigenesis can potentially block tumor formation.
Melanoma
Melanocytes developmentally originate from the migration of neural crest cells and the Wnt signaling plays an essential role in the determination of melanocyte cell fate[65 ▶,66 ▶]. Melanoma is a type of skin tumor that originates from the basal layer of the skin and from the pigment producing cells, melanocytes. Compared to other types of skin tumors, melanoma is a more malignant one. The interaction between this tumor and Wnt/β-Catenin signaling has been known for years[65 ▶,66 ▶]. It has been reported that almost all forms of benign melanoma have nuclear β-Catenin[65 ▶,66 ▶]. Therefore, the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway appears to support proliferation and escape from senescence of early melanoma tumor cells[65 ▶]. It has also been shown that the advanced melanoma cells lackβ-Catenin in the nucleus[65 ▶,66 ▶]. These observations are very interesting as they suggest a very complex role of Wnt/β-Catenin pathway in this type of malignancy. Probably cancer stage and tumor microenvironment are important factors when studying the interaction between Wnt/β-Catenin signaling and melanoma tumorigenesis. As mentioned before, the signals through Wnt and Frizzled proteins have generally been divided into canonical (the Wnt/β-Catenin) and non-canonical pathways. Although the role of canonical Wnt signaling was originally highlighted in human cancers (perhaps due to the intensive investigation of colorectal cancers), more recent results indicate that the non-canonical Wnt pathways are also involved in human carcinogenesis[5 ▶-7 ▶]. Based on the current knowledge about human carcinomas (the tumors originating from epithelial tissues), in the case of the tumors dependent on Wnt signaling, it appears that the canonical Wnt pathway supports early tumorigenesis, while the non-canonical Wnt pathways help tumor invasion and metastasis[5 ▶-7 ▶]. In melanoma, the genetic mutations of the components of the canonical Wnt pathway (including β-Catenin itself) are rare, but the non-canonical Wnt pathway (mediated by Wnt-5a) helps tumor metastasis[65 ▶]. The increased intracellular levels of β-Catenin during early stages of melanoma is likely due to the activation of other signaling pathways[65 ▶]. The experiments performed in mice have suggested that β-Catenin-mediated melanoma formation is dependent on the activation of the proto-oncogene, N-Ras[66 ▶]. It has been speculated that the downregulation of β-Catenin signaling, which occurs during melanoma aggression, is possibly due to the activation of non-canonical Wnt pathways[65 ▶-67 ▶]. One proposed mechanism is that interaction of Wnt-5a with Frizzled 2/5 and the coreceptor, ROR2 (a receptor tyrosine kinase) activates phosphatidylinositol signaling, which leads to the release of calcium from intracellular stores and activation of protein kinase C[13 ▶,65 ▶]. The outcome of the released calcium could include the activation of calpain-mediated proteolysis of filamin, upregulation of the transcription factor, Snail, and upregulation of the cytoskeleton protein, Vimentin, which collectively enhance cell motility and transition of tumor cells to a mesenchymal phenotype[67 ▶,68 ▶]. It has also been revealed that Wnt-5a activation leads to the proteolysis of β-Catenin via a mechanism that is independent of GSK-3β and is through the activation of the ubiquitin ligase, SIAH2[65 ▶]. These results all show that the downregulation of β-Catenin occurs during melanoma tumor invasion.
Hepatocellular carcinoma
HCC is one of the leading cause of death from cancer in many populations, and studies have exhibited that the aberrant regulation of Wnt signaling (both canonical and non-canonical) is involved in hepatocellular carcinogenesis[69 ▶-73 ▶]. HCC (like many other carcinomas) is a multi-stage and complex disease that requires the accumulation of several genetic and epigenetic changes to develop. Deregulation of the canonical Wnt signaling (and therefore the upregulation of β-Catenin) in HCC is very common and occurs in nearly 95% of the cases[70 ▶,71 ▶]. It appears that a relatively similar mechanism to what discussed for melanoma applies for HCC as well, that the canonical Wnt signaling (the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway) is involved in the initiation of hepatocellular tumorigenesis, while the non-canonical Wnt pathway helps tumor advancement and invasion[71 ▶]. Therefore, a combination of Wnt signaling pathways can support the proliferation, survival, migration, and invasiveness of hepatocytes[69 ▶-72 ▶]. The molecular events leading to the activation of β-Catenin in HCC include CTNNB1 and AXIN gene mutations, WNT3/FZD7 overexpression, and sFRP1/5 repression[71]. APC gene mutations in HCC are rare and include only 1% to 3% of cases[71 ▶]. It has been estimated that between 40% to 70% of HCC cases have nuclear β-Catenin accumulation. It is interesting to mention that β-Catenin gene (CTNNB1) mutations normally occur late in HCC tumorigenesis, but the cellular accumulation of β-Catenin is an early event[71 ▶]. This means that the early cellular accumulation of β-Catenin in HCC is probably not due to the mutations in the β-Catenin-encoding gene. The above information also suggests that the late β-Catenin mutations probably have an extra role in HCC tumorigenesis. A balanced β-Catenin signaling is important for liver tissue homeostasis, and therefore the deregulation of Wnt/β-Catenin pathway probably has an important role in the initiation of HCC[69 ▶-72 ▶]. However, studies in mice have shown that β-Catenin upregulation per se is not sufficient to initiate hepatoma, and other pathways like H-Ras signaling are also required for the initiation of the tumor[71 ▶]. Also, by using conditional knockout experiments, it has been reported that diethyl-nitrosamine-induced HCC in mice can be enhanced severalfold either in the absence of wild type β-Catenin or in the presence of a mutant β-Catenin[69 ▶,71 ▶]. These results have made it difficult to conclude that Wnt/β-Catenin signaling is involved in the initiation of HCC tumorigenesis, but more recent results have indicated that both types of Wnt signaling pathway (canonical and non-canonical) help HCC aggressiveness and resistance to therapy and also provide an appropriate microenvironment to support tumor growth and survival[69 ▶,70 ▶,73 ▶].
Pancreatic cancer
PDAC is among the deadliest human cancers with an overall survival rate of about 8%[74 ▶-77 ▶]. The metastasis is relatively common and more than half of the patients have already distant metastases at the time of diagnosis[74]. Activating mutations in the KRAS gene have been detected in more than 95% of the cases[74 ▶,75 ▶]. Also, inactivation of the tumor suppressors like p53, INK4a, and DPC4 is documented in pancreatic cancer progression and development[74 ▶]. In addition, deregulation of signaling pathways like those mediated by Hedgehog, Notch, and Wnt may occur in pancreatic cancer, which has an important role in the progression of the tumor[75 ▶]. Nuclear accumulation of β-Catenin has been detected in moderate to poorly differentiated PDAC, and it has been noted that nuclear β-Catenin accompanies with poor prognosis[74 ▶]. Meanwhile, the genetic mutations of downstream components of the canonical Wnt pathway are not very common in pancreatic cancer[74 ▶,76 ▶,77 ▶]. This means that probably molecular changes affecting the upstream levels of Wnt signaling are acting in β-Catenin upregulation. In fact, overexpression of Wnts and Frizzled receptors has been reported in PDAC[75 ▶]. It has been shown that the upregulation of β-Catenin during mice development leads to pancreatoblastoma, while upregulation of this protein after birth results in PDAC[74 ▶,75 ▶]. Interestingly, several β-Catenin target genes (including Gli2, Id2, Vegfc, and Cyr61) have been linked to the tumorigenesis of PDAC. In this sense, the role of CYR61 has been highlighted in malignant potential of PDAC[74 ▶]. Higher expression of CYR61 has been detected in about 85% of PDAC cases, and expression of this gene has been associated with the later stages of the disease[74 ▶]. It has been suggested that CYR61 binds to LRP6 and activates Wnt/β-Catenin pathway using a positive feedback loop[74 ▶]. Although the role of non-canonical Wnt pathways in PDAC development is unclear, studies have revealed that Wnt-5a-mediated signaling is involved in the transformation of pancreatic cancer cells[74 ▶].
Clinical targeting of the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling
Due to the interaction between Wnt/β-Catenin signaling and human carcinogenesis, this signaling pathway has been considered as a potential clinical target for the prevention and treatment of a large number of human cancers, especially those dependent on Wnt/β-Catenin signaling at early stages (like colon cancer). However, targeting such an important signaling pathway without clinical side effects seems to be difficult. This issue gets more serious when there are cross-talks between Wnt/β-Catenin signaling and other signaling pathways. After about 40 years of intensive research on Wnt signaling[78 ▶], there are still some unanswered questions about the regulation of this signaling pathway. Despite these limitations, several compounds have been introduced as candidates to downregulate Wnt/β-Catenin signaling in human cancers. Although none of these compounds has yet been approved for clinical use, some have produced promising results in pre-clinical studies. Some of these compounds and their specific targets have been briefly discussed below.
β-Catenin/TCF
Perhaps the most specific segment of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling is the interaction of β-Catenin with TCF/Lef family members and the transcriptional activities of this protein complex. Although the genes regulated by the complex of β-Catenin/TCF may vary based on the cell-context, specific targeting of this protein complex appears to be promising. Currently, several compounds, including PKF115-584, CGP049090, iCRT3, iCRT5, iCRT14, PNU-74654, and BC21, against β-Catenin/TCF complex are under preclinical investigations[79 ▶-82 ▶].
Tankyrase 1/2
Several compounds, like XAV939, IWR, and G007-LK, have been designed to upregulate Axin, an inherent component of the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway[6 ▶,81 ▶,82 ▶]. These compounds are, in fact, the inhibitors of the enzyme, Tankyrase. Tankyrase 1/2 is involved in ADP-ribosylation of Axin and therefore destabilizes this protein via inducing its ubiquitylation and degradation[6 ▶,81 ▶,82 ▶]. As mentioned above, Axin, as a second scaffold protein (after APC), functions as a negative regulator of β-Catenin stability.
Porcupine
Appropriate synthesis and secretion of Wnt proteins have crucial roles in the activation of both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways[6 ▶]. Secretion of Wnt ligands is a very complex process, and for most Wnt proteins, glycosylation and lipid modification (acylation) are prerequisites for appropriate vesicular trafficking and secretion[5 ▶,6 ▶]. Porcupine is a membrane protein with O-acyltransferase activity and is involved in palmitoylation (at a serine residue) and maturation of most Wnt proteins[6 ▶,83 ▶]. It has been demonstrated that the palmitoylated serine is one of the interacting sites of the Wnt proteins to the extracellular cysteine-rich domain of Frizzled receptors[6 ▶,83 ▶]. It has also been shown that in the absence of Porcupine, the Wnt proteins cannot be secreted and are trapped in endoplasmic reticulum[83 ▶]. Based on these data, it can be concluded that Porcupine is a potential clinical target although it seems likely that the blockade of Porcupine affects the secretion of many Wnt proteins and produces non-specific and unwanted results. The compounds IWP2, LGK974, and C59 are among the blockers of Porcupine[6 ▶,82 ▶].
Other targets
It is worth mentioning that the above targets are not the only ones that have been considered for clinical investigations to modulate Wnt/β-Catenin signaling. The other targets include DVL, Wnts, and Frizzled proteins[82 ▶]. The compounds like FJ9, NSC668036, and 3289-8625 have been used for preclinical studies against DVL (the human homologue for Drosophila Dishevelled proteins) [82 ▶]. Based on the knowledge about the role of DVL proteins in regulating Wnt signaling, it is quite predictable that blocking these proteins may have a huge effect on the biological activities of many cells (including cancer cells). DVL is a critical protein involved in regulating both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling. DVL is, in fact, an upstream component of the Wnt pathways and has a very important role in specifying the signals through Wnt and Frizzled proteins[5 ▶-7 ▶]. These features of DVL proteins make them challenging targets as far as the cytotoxicity and drug side effects are concerned. A monoclonal antibody (OMP-18R5) has been generated that recognizes several Frizzled receptors and is currently in phase I clinical trial[84 ▶]. Application of specific monoclonal antibodies against oncogenic tyrosine kinase receptors has been proven to be successful, and some of such antibodies (like Herceptin against Her2/Neu) have been approved for clinical use. RTKs are more diverse than Frizzled proteins (58 vs. 10), and they have potential mitogenic activities. Also, overexpression of RTKs has been observed in several human cancers[85 ▶], while the expression levels of Frizzled proteins in human cancers have not been extensively studied. Since there are only 10 Frizzled proteins encoded by human genome and the involvement of these proteins in both canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways, it can be concluded that each Frizzled protein may regulate several biological activities. Therefore, for clinical purposes, targeting a Frizzled receptor with monoclonal antibodies appears to be more challenging than that for receptor tyrosine kinases.
Conclusions and future directions
There is no doubt that the canonical Wnt signaling (or the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway) is a potential clinical target for cancer therapy. However, an important question is which segment of this pathway should be targeted to produce better and more specific results. The final step of a signaling pathway appears to be the best choice, which for the canonical Wnt pathway includes the β-Catenin-mediated gene transcription. However, the transcriptional activities of β-Catenin should be cellular context-dependent, and the β-Catenin/TCF complex may not be the only factor in specifying the target genes. Definitely, further investigations on molecular details of β-Catenin transcriptional complexes are needed to address the above question.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported in part by a grant from Iran National Science Foundation, INSF (93004354) and also by the University of Tehran Research Department, Tehran, Iran.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
None declared.
References
- Komiya , Habas R. Wnt signal transduction pathways. Organogenesis. 2008;4(2):68–75. doi: 10.4161/org.4.2.5851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rao TP, Kühl M. An updated overview on Wnt signaling pathways: A prelude for more. Circulation research. 2010;106(12):1798–1806. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.219840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peifer M, Rauskolb C, Williams M, Riggleman B, Wieschaus E. The segment polarity gene armadillo interacts with the wingless signaling pathway in both embryonic and adult pattern formation. Development. 1991;111(4):1029–1043. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.4.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noordermeer J, Klingensmith J, Perrimon N, Nusse R. Dishevelled and Armadillo act in the wingless signalling pathway in Drosophila. Nature. 1994;367(6458):80–83. doi: 10.1038/367080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/β-Catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149(6):1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β -Catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169(6):985–999. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh M. Canonical and non-canonical WNT signaling in cancer stem cells and their niches: Cellular heterogeneity, omics reprogramming, targeted therapy and tumor plasticity. International journal of oncology. 2017;51(5):1357–1369. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhan T, Rindtorff N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(11):1461–1473. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Staal FJT, Famili F, Perez LG, Pike-Overzet K. Aberrant Wnt signaling in leukemia. Cancer. 2016;8(9) doi: 10.3390/cancers8090078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nusse R, Varmus HE. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell. 1982;31(1):99–109. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90409-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nusse R, van Ooyen A, Cox D, Fung YK, Varmus HE. Mode of proviral activation of a putative mammary oncogene (int-1) on mouse chromosome 15. Nature. 1984;307(5947):131–136. doi: 10.1038/307131a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng G, Awan F, Otruba W, Muller P, Apte U, Tan X, Gandhi C, Demetris AJ, Monga SP. Wnt’er in liver: Expression of Wnt and Frizzled genes in mouse. Hepatology. 2007;45(1):195–204. doi: 10.1002/hep.21473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okamoto M, Udagawa N, Uehara S, Maeda K, Yamashita T, Nakamichi Y, Kato H, Saito N, Minami Y, Takahashi N, Kobayashi Y. Noncanonical Wnt5a enhances Wnt/β-catenin signaling during osteo-blastogenesis. Scientific reports. 2014;4:4493. doi: 10.1038/srep04493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ji TH, Grossman M, Ji I. G Protein-coupled receptors: Diversity of receptor-ligand interactions. Journal of biological chemistry. 1998;273(28):17299–17302. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.28.17299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Najafi SM. Activators of G proteins inhibit GSK-3beta and stabilize beta-catenin in xenopus oocytes. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2009;382(2):365–369. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salmanian S, Najafi SM, Rafipour M, Arjomand MR, Shahheydari H, Ansari S, Kashkooli L, Rasouli SJ, Saghaeian Jazi M, Minaei T. Regulation of GSK-3beta and beta-Catenin by Galphaq in HEK293T cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2010;395(4):577–582. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slusarski DC, Yang-Snyder J, Busa WB, Moon RT. Modulation of embryonic intracellular Ca2/signaling by Wnt-5A. Developmental biology. 1997;182(1):114–120. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katanaev VL, Ponzielli R, Sémériva M, Tomlinson A. Trimeric G protein-dependent frizzled signaling in Drosophila. Cell. 2005;120(1):111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koval A, Purvanov V, Egger-Adam D, Katanaev VL. Yellow submarine of the Wnt/Frizzled signaling: Submerging from the G protein harbor to the targets. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2011;82(10):1311–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Egger-Adam D, Katanaev VL. Trimeric G protein-dependent signaling by frizzled receptors in animal development. Frontiers in bioscience. 2008;13:4740–4755. doi: 10.2741/3036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nichols AS, Floyd DH, Bruinsma SP, Narzinski K, Baranski TJ. Frizzled receptors signal through G-proteins. Cellular signalling. 2013;25(6):1468–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turm H, Grisaru-Granvosky S, Maoz M, Offermanns S, Bar-Shavit R. DVL as a scaffold protein capturing classical GPCRs. Communicative and integrative biology. 2010;3(6):495–498. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.6.12979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Q, Gao N. Keeping Wnt signalosome in check by vesicular traffic. Journal of cellular physiology. 2015;230(6):1170–1180. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahmani M, Carthy JM, McManus BM. Mapping of the Wnt/β-catenin/TCF response elements in the human versican promoter. Methods in molecular biology. 2012;836:35–52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-498-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang Y, Massague J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: Twist in development and metastasis. Cell. 2004;118(3):277–279. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiery JP. Epithelial–mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nature reviews cancer. 2002;2(6):442–454. doi: 10.1038/nrc822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malumbres M, Barbacid M. To cycle or not to cycle: a critical decision in cancer. Nature reviews cancer. 2001;1(3):222–231. doi: 10.1038/35106065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silvia Lapenna S, Giordano A. Cell cycle kinases as therapeutic targets for cancer. Nature reviews drug discovery. 2009;8(7):547–566. doi: 10.1038/nrd2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blagosklonny MV, Pardee AB. The restriction point of the cell cycle. Cell cycle. 2002;1(2):103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller DM, Thomas SD, Islam A, Muench D, Sedoris K. c-Myc and cancer metabolism. Clinical cancer research. 2012;18(20):5546–5553. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dang CV, Resar LM, Emison E, Kim S, Li Q, Prescott JE, Wonsey D, Zeller K. Function of the c-Myc oncogenic transcription factor. Experimental cell research. 1999;253(1):63–77. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumari A, Folk WP, Sakamuro D. The dual roles of MYC in genomic instability and cancer chemoresistance. Genes. 2017;8(6):E158. doi: 10.3390/genes8060158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawasaki Y, Komiya M, Matsumura K, Negishi L, Suda S, Okuno M, Yokota N, Osada T, Nagashima T, Hiyoshi M, OkadaHatakeyama M, Kitayama J, Shirahige K, Akiyama T. MYU, a target lncRNA for Wnt/c-Myc signaling, mediates induction of CDK6 to promote cell cycle progression. Cell reports. 2016;16(10):2554–2564. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wisdom R, Johnson RS, Moore C. c-Jun regulates cell cycle progression and apoptosis by distinct mechanisms. EMBO journal. 1999;18:188–197. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.1.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gustems M, Woellmer A, Rothbauer U, Eck SH, Wieland T, Lutter D, Hammerschmidt W. c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers regulate cellular genes via a newly identified class of methylated DNA sequence motifs. Nucleic acids research. 2014;42(5):3059–3072. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schreiber M, Kolbus A, Piu F, Szabowski A, Möhle-Steinlein U, Tian J, Karin M, Angel P, Wagner EF. Control of cell cycle progression by c-Jun is p53 dependent. Genes and development. 1999;13(5):607–619. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.5.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polistena A, Cucina A, Dinicola S, Stene C, Cavallaro G, Ciardi A, Gennaro O, Rossella A, Giuseppe D, Antonino C, Louis Banka J, Giorgio DT. MMP7 expression in colorectal tumours of different stages. In vivo. 2014;28(1):105–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slusarz A, Nichols LA, Grunz-Borgmann EA, Chen G, Akintola AD, Catania JM, Burghardt RC, Trzeciakowski JP, Parrish AR. Overexpression of MMP-7 increases collagen 1A2 in the aging kidney. Physiological reports. 2013;1(5):pii e00090. doi: 10.1002/phy2.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basu S, Thorat R, Dalal SN. MMP7 is required to mediate cell invasion and tumor formation upon Plakophilin3 loss. PLoS one. 2015;10(4):e0123979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pryczynicz A, Gryko M, Niewiarowska K, Dymicka-Piekarska V, Ustymowicz M, Hawryluk M, CEpowicz D, Borsuk A, Lemona A Fa, ulski W, Guzinska- Ustymowicz. Immunohistochemical expression of MMP-7 protein and its serum level in colorectal cancer. Folia histochemistry cytobiologica. 2013;51(3):206–212. doi: 10.5603/FHC.2013.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senger DR, Gallil SJ, Dvorak AM, Perruzzi CA, Harvey VS, Dvorak HF. Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of ascites fluid. Science. 1983;219(4587):983–985. doi: 10.1126/science.6823562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee SH, Jeong D, Han YS, Baek MJ. Pivotal role of vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor angiogenesis. Annals of surgical treatment and research. 2015;89(1):1–8. doi: 10.4174/astr.2015.89.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bendardaf R, Buhmeida A, Hilska M, Laato M, Syrjänen S, Syrjänen K, Collan Y, Pyrhönen S. VEGF-1 expression in colorectal cancer is associated with disease localization, stage, and long-term disease-specific survival. Anticancer research. 2008;28(6B):3865–3870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haque T, Nakada S, Hamdy RC. A review of FGF18: its expression, signaling pathways and possible functions during embryogenesis and post-natal development. Histology and histopathology. 2007;22(1):97–105. doi: 10.14670/HH-22.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sonvilla G, Allerstorfer S, Stättner S, Karner J, Klimpfinger M, Fischer H, Grasl-Kraupp B, Holzmann K, Berger W, Friedrich Wrba F, Marian B, Grusch M. FGF18 in colorectal tumour cells: autocrine and paracrine effects. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(1):15–24. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beenken A, Mohammadi M. The FGF family: biology, pathophysiology and therapy. Nature reviews drug discovery. 2009;8(3):235–253. doi: 10.1038/nrd2792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore EE, Bendele AM, Thompson DL, Littau A, Waggie KS, Reardon B, Ellsworth JL. Fibroblast growth factor-18 stimulates chondrogenesis and cartilage repair in a rat model of injury-induced osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis cartilage. 2005;13(7):623–631. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Organ SL, Tsao MS. An overview of the c-MET signaling pathway. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology. 2011;3(1 Suppl):S7–S19. doi: 10.1177/1758834011422556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sagi Z, Hieronymus T. The impact of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulator hepatocyte growth factor receptor/Met on skin immunity by modulating langerhans cell migration. Frontiers in immunology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kermorgant S, Aparicio T, Dessirier V, Lewin MJ, Lehy T. Hepatocyte growth factor induces colonic cancer cell invasiveness via enhanced motility and protease overproduction. Evidence for PI3 kinase and PKC involvement. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22(7):1035–1042. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.7.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin X, Zhang T, Su X, Ji Y, Ye P, Fu H, Fan S, Shen Y, Gavine PR, Gu Y. Relationships between Chromosome 7 gain, MET gene copy number increase and MET protein overexpression in chinese papillary renal cell carcinoma patients. PLoS one. 2015;10(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Safaie Qamsari E, Safaei Ghaderi S, Zarei B, Dorostkar R, Bagheri S, Jadidi-Niaragh F Somi MH, Yousefi M. The c-Met receptor: Implication for targeted therapies in colorectal cancer. Tumor biology. 2017;39(5):1–13. doi: 10.1177/1010428317699118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. Telomeres, stem cells, senescence, and cancer. Journal of clinical investigation. 2004;113(2):160–168. doi: 10.1172/JCI20761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan G. Telomerase regulation and the intimate relationship with aging. Research and reports in biochemistry. 2013;3:71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Mathon NF, Lloyd AC. Cell senescense and cancer. Nature reviews cancer. 2001;1(3):203–213. doi: 10.1038/35106045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura Y, de Paiva Alves E, Veenstra GJ, Hoppler S. Tissue- and stage-specific Wnt target gene expression is controlled subsequent to β-catenin recruitment to cis-regulatory modules. Development. 2016;143(11):1914–1925. doi: 10.1242/dev.131664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kam Y, Quaranta V. Cadherin-bound β-Catenin feeds into the Wnt pathway upon adherens junctions dissociation: evidence for an intersection between β-Catenin pools. PLoS one. 2009;4(2):e4580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peinado H, Portillo F, Cano A. Transcriptional regulation of cadherins during development and Carcinogenesis. The international journal of developmental biology. 2004;48(5-6):365–375. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041794hp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krejci P, Aklian A, Kaucka M, Sevcikova E, Prochazkova J, Masek JK, Mikolka P, Pospisilova T, Spoustova T, Weis MA, Paznekas WA, Wolf JH, Gutkind JS, Wilcox WR, Kozubik A, Wang Jabs E, Bryja V, Salazar L, Vesela I, Balek L. Receptor tyrosine kinases activate canonical Wnt/β-Catenin signaling via MAP kinase/LRP6 pathway and direct β-Catenin phosphorylation. PLoS one. 2012;7(4):e35826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ilyas M, Tomlinson IPM, Rowan A, Pignatelli M, Bodmer WF. Beta-Catenin mutations in cell lines established from human colorectal cancers. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences USA. 1997;94(19):10330–10334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qi J, Zhu YQ, Luo J, Tao WH. Hypermethylation and expression regulation of secreted Frizzled-related protein genes in colorectal tumor. World journal of gastroenterology. 2006;12(44):7113–7117. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i44.7113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senda T, Iizuka-Kogo A, Onouchi T, Shimomura A. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) plays multiple roles in the intestinal and colorectal epithelia. Medical molecular morphology. 2007;40(2):68–81. doi: 10.1007/s00795-006-0352-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fodde R, Smits R, Clevers H. APC, signal transduction and genetic instability colorectal cancer. Nature reviewscancer. 2001;1(1):55–67. doi: 10.1038/35094067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson V, Volikos E, Halford SE, Eftekhar Sadat ET, Popat S, Talbot I, Truninger K, Martin J, Jass J, Houlston R, Atkin W, Tomlinson IP, Silver AR. Exon 3 beta-catenin mutations are specifically associated with colorectal carcinomas in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Gut. 2005;54(2):264–267. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.048132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur A, Webster MR, Weeraratna AT. In the Wnt-er of life: Wnt signalling in melanoma and ageing. British journal of cancer. 2016;115(11):1273–1279. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chien AJ, Moore EC, Lonsdorf AS, Kulikauskas RM, Rothberg BG, Berger AJ, Major MB, Hwang ST, Rimm DL, Moon RT. Activated Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in melanoma is associated with decreased proliferation in patient tumors and a murine melanoma model. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences USA. 2009;106(4):1193–1198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811902106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kovacs D, Migliano E, Muscardin L, Silipo V, Catricalà C, Picardo M, Bellei B. The role of WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway in melanoma epithelial-to-mesenchyma-like switching: evidences from patients-derived cell lines. Oncotarget. 2016;7(28):43295–43314. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Connell MP, Fiori JL, Baugher KM, Indig FE, French AD, Camilli TC, Frank BP, Earley R, Hoek KS, Hasskamp JH, George Elias E, Taub DD, Bernier M, Weeraratna AT. Wnt5A activates the calpain-mediated cleavage of filamin A. Journal of investigative dermatology. 2009;129(7):1782–1789. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu LJ, Xie SX, Chen YT, Xue JL, Zhang CJ, Zhu F. Aberrant regulation of Wnt signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. World journal of gastroenterology. 2016;22(33):7486–7499. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i33.7486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waisberg J, Saba GT. Wnt-/-β-catenin pathway signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. World journal of hepatology. 2015;7(26):2631–2635. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i26.2631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pez F, Lopez A, Kim M, Wands JR, Caron de Fromentel C, Merle P. Wnt signaling and hepatocarcinogenesis: Molecular targets for the development of innovative anticancer drugs. Journal of hepatology. 2013;59(5):1107–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wands JR, Kim M. WNT/β-Catenin signaling and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2014;60(2):452–454. doi: 10.1002/hep.27081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fako V, Yu Z, Henrich CJ, Ransom T, Budhu AS, Wang XW. Inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma by an antipsychotic drug pimozide. International journal of biological sciences. 2016;12(7):768–775. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.14718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sano M, Driscoll DR, Wilfredo E, Quattrochi B, Appleman VA, Ou J, Zhu LJ, Yoshida N, Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Sugitani M, Nemoto N, Klimstra DS, Lewis BC. Activation of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling enhances pancreatic cancer development and the malignant potential via up-regulation of Cyr61. Neoplasia. 2016;18(12):785–794. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Morris JP, Yan W, Schofield HK, Gurney A, Simeone DM, Millar SE, Hoey T Hebrok M, Pasca di Maglian M. Canonical Wnt signaling is required for pancreatic carcinogenesis. Cancer research. 2013;73(15):4909–4922. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wall I, Schmidt-Wolf IG. Effect of Wnt inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Anticancer research. 2014;34(10):5375–5380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng G, Germinaro M, Micsenyi A, Monga NK, Bell A, Sood A, Malhotraz V, Soodz N, Midday V, Monga DK, Kokkinakis DM, Monga SPS. Aberrant Wnt/β-Catenin signaling in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Neoplasia. 2006;8(4):279–289. doi: 10.1593/neo.05607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nusse R, Varmus H. Three decades of Wnts: a personal perspective on how a scientific field developed. EMBO journal. 2012;31(12):2670–2684. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang SY, Deng X, Byun S, Lee C, Lee SJ, Suh H, Zhang J, Kang Q, Zhang T, Westover KD, Mandinova A, Lee SW. Direct targeting of β-Catenin by a small molecule stimulates proteasomal degradation and suppresses oncogenic Wnt/ β-Catenin signaling. Cell reports. 2016;16(1):28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin SH, Lim DY, Reddy K, Malakhova M, Liu F, Wang T, Song M, Chen H, Bae KB, Ryu J, Liu K, Lee M-H, Bode AM, Dong Z. A small molecule inhibitor of the β-Catenin-TCF4 interaction suppresses colorectal cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. EBioMedicine. 2017:25: 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashihara E, Takada T, Maekawa T. Targeting the canonical Wnt⁄β-catenin pathway in hematological malignancies. Cancer science. 2015;106(6):665–671. doi: 10.1111/cas.12655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahn M. Can we safely target the WNT pathway? Nature Reviews Drug discovery. 2014;13(7):513–532. doi: 10.1038/nrd4233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willert K, Nusse R. Wnt proteins. Cold spring harbor perspectives in biology. 2012;4(9):a007864. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masuda M, Sawa M, Yamada T. Therapeutic targets in theWnt signaling pathway: feasibility of targeting TNIK in colorectal cancer. Pharmacology and therapeutics. 2015;156:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skorski T. Oncogenic tyrosine kinases and DNA-damage responses. Nature reviews cancer. 2002;2(5):351–360. doi: 10.1038/nrc799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


