Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236434

Table 1. Patient characteristics of the total cohort of major depressive disorder (MDD) and the patient groups established by the TRD definitions: Karolinska Institutet Model (KIM), European Staging Method (ESM), Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Method (MGH-s), and Maudsley Staging Method (MSM).

Anti-depressant initiator and MDD KIM ESM MGH-s MSM p-value
n patients / n TRD patients 127,108 16,453 12,059 24,112 19,486
% TRD patients 12.9 9.5 19.0 15.3 <0.001c
Females (%) 58.4 58.1 58.0 58.1 58.0 0.995c
Age in years 18–29 34.2 29.7 29.0 31.5 30.8 <0.001d
30–59 51.9 53.7 53.3 53.1 53.1
60–79 11.6 13.9 14.8 12.8 13.5
≥80 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.6
Age in years, mean (SD) 41.9 (17.1) 42.4 (17.3) 41.1 (17.1) 41.5 (17.1)
Income (%)a Low 52.2 51.1 49.9 51.8 51.3 0.049c
Average 45.1 46.3 47.3 45.5 46.0
High 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.7
Country of birth (%) Sweden 79.9 79.3 79.9 79.8 79.6
Nordic country (excl. Sweden) 2.6 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.9 0.867c
Europe (excl. Nordic countries) 7.0 7.8 7.3 7.4 7.6
Other 10.4 9.9 10.0 9.9 9.9
Missing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Charlson Comorbidity Index (%) 0 85.1 83.9 83.5 84.4 84.2 0.450c
1 10.5 11.7 11.9 11.3 11.4
>1 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.3 4.4
TRD patients identified by other definitions (%) 0–Exclusively identified by this definition - 0.0 0.5 34.1 16.0 <0.001c
1 –By one other definition - 1.8 0.1 1.4 2.4
2 –By more than one other definition - 30.4 7.0 18.3 24.5
3 –By all definitions - 67.7 92.4 46.2 57.2
Days until TRDb Mean (SD) - 78.2 (122.8) 83.7 (123.5) 73.3 (132.3) 75.2 (121.3) <0.001d
Median (IQR) - 69 (0–161) 75 (0–168) 60 (0–152) 64 (0–158)

a ‘Low’ income is defined as below the second decile (20) in the general population, ‘Average’ is between the second and the eight decile (20–80) of the general population and ‘High’ is above the eight percentile.

b Days from index date to being defined as a TRD. The index date is the date the patients had had both first filling of the antidepressant and a depression diagnosis; this is the explanation why a small number of patients got 0 days before TRD and not 3 X required length of treatment in the model.

c Chi-square test.

d One-way ANOVA.