Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;79(8):1055–1062. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216988

Table 2.

Associations with living in rural areas and outcome among those commencing a biologic therapy

Univariable regression analyses, adjusted for age gender, local area deprivation and baseline score (as appropriate)
Categorical outcomes OR 95% CI
ASAS response criteria ASAS20 met 0.93 (0.59 to 1.47)
ASAS40 met 0.96 (0.58 to 1.57)
Continuous outcomes Coef 95% CI
Disease activity BASDAI: 0 (best) – 10 (worst) −0.05 (−0.56 to 0.46)
Physical function BASFI: 0 (best) – 10 (worst) 0.17 (−0.46 to 0.50)
Quality of life ASQoL: 0 (best) – 18 (worst) 0.06 (−0.99 to 1.11)
Fatigue CFS: 0 (best) – 11 (worst) −0.16 (−0.94 to 0.62)
Sleep disturbance Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire: 0 (best) – 20 (worst) 0.32 (−0.80 to 1.44)
Anxiety HADS: 0 (best) – 21 (worst) 0.22 (−0.50 to 0.95)
Depression HADS: 0 (best) – 21 (worst) −0.35 (−1.07 to 0.37)
Work absenteeism % 1.52 (−3.78 to 6.81)
Work presenteeism* % 9.96 (2.85 to 17.06)
Overall work impairment* % 10.37 (2.63 to 18.10)
Activity impairment % 0.74 (−4.84 to 6.32)

*Indicates significant difference between urban and rural dwellers (p<0.05).

ASAS, Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis; ASQoL, Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Index; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; CFS, Chalder Fatigue Scale; Coef, β coefficients; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.