Table 1.
Regions of brain injury that most significantly predict performance for all behavioral tasksa
| Determinant | Predictors | Unstandardizedcoefficients |
R | Adjusted R2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | |||||
| Staircase: impaired limb pellets retrieved (week 1) | (Constant) | 19.972 | 1.110 | 0.784 | 0.595 | <0.001 |
| CFA | −0.382 | 0.104 | ||||
| RFA | −0.755 | 0.285 | ||||
| Staircase: impaired limb pellets retrieved (week 7) | (Constant) | 20.773 | 1.003 | 0.849 | 0.707 | <0.001 |
| Lateral to RFA | −0.362 | 0.079 | ||||
| CFA | −0.305 | 0.091 | ||||
| Cylinder: impaired limb usage (week 1) | (Constant) | 0.516 | 0.038 | 0.591 | 0.334 | <0.001 |
| CFA | −0.012 | 0.003 | ||||
| Cylinder: impaired limb usage (week 7) | (Constant) | 0.542 | 0.031 | 0.562 | 0.299 | <0.001 |
| Lateral to CFA | −0.012 | 0.003 | ||||
| Beam forelimb: % of successful steps (week 1) | (Constant) | 0.983 | 0.024 | 0.393 | 0.134 | 0.008 |
| CFA | −0.005 | 0.002 | ||||
| Beam forelimb: % of successful steps (week 7) | (Constant) | 0.977 | 0.012 | 0.488 | 0.220 | 0.001 |
| Lateral to CFA | −0.004 | 0.001 | ||||
| Beam hindlimb: % of successful steps (week 1) | (Constant) | 0.928 | 0.023 | 0.550 | 0.286 | <0.001 |
| HL | −0.013 | 0.003 | ||||
| Beam hindlimb: % of successful steps (week 1) | (Constant) | 0.905 | 0.013 | 0.516 | 0.249 | <0.001 |
| Medial to HL | −0.011 | 0.003 | ||||
| % time in impaired pellet zone (week 1) | (Constant) | 16.517 | 2.268 | 0.696 | 0.433 | 0.012 |
| CFA | −0.703 | 0.229 | ||||
| % time in impaired pellet zone (week 7) | (Constant) | 20.774 | 4.397 | 0.677 | 0.404 | 0.016 |
| RFA | −2.593 | 0.892 | ||||
| Pellets remaining in impaired pellet zone (week 1) | (Constant) | 1.970 | 0.423 | 0.712 | 0.457 | 0.009 |
| CFA | 0.137 | 0.043 | ||||
| Pellets remaining in impaired pellet zone (week 7) | (Constant) | 0.873 | 0.667 | 0.764 | 0.542 | 0.004 |
| RFA | 0.507 | 0.135 | ||||
aAll predictors represent the sum of infarct volume within a specific subregion. The unit for each determinant is task-specific and shown in its corresponding figure. For bivariate correlations between each behavior and all ROIs, see Table 2.