Table 2.
Bivariate correlations between behavioral tasks and each ROIa
| Behavioral task | ROI |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial HL | Lateral HL | Medial CFA | Lateral CFA | Medial RFA | Lateral RFA | HL | CFA | RFA | |
| Staircase: impaired limb pellets retrieved (week 1) | –0.180* | –0.344** | –0.571† | –0.721† | –0.474† | –0.698† | –0.439*** | –0.741† | –0.698† |
| Staircase: impaired limb pellets retrieved (week 7) | –0.208* | –0.355** | –0.672† | –0.785† | –0.627† | –0.802† | –0.442*** | –0.760† | –0.773† |
| Cylinder: impaired limb usage (week 1) | –0.212* | –0.465† | –0.380** | –0.551† | –0.322** | –0.438*** | –0.411*** | –0.591† | –0.475† |
| Cylinder: impaired limb usage (week 7) | –0.246* | –0.414*** | –0.471† | –0.562† | –0.382** | –0.455*** | –0.427*** | –0.544† | –0.538† |
| Beam forelimb: % of successful steps (week 1) | –0.270* | –0.296* | –0.340** | –0.350** | –0.194* | –0.250* | –0.351** | –0.393*** | –0.379** |
| Beam forelimb: % of successful steps (week 7) | –0.080* | –0.335** | –0.132* | –0.488† | –0.084* | –0.389*** | –0.218* | –0.346** | –0.321** |
| Beam hindlimb: % of successful steps (week 1) | –0.370** | –0.482† | –0.357** | –0.426*** | –0.244* | –0.312** | –0.550† | –0.434*** | –0.260* |
| Beam hindlimb: % of successful steps (week 1) | –0.516† | –0.392*** | –0.241* | –0.138* | –0.072* | –0.083* | –0.454*** | –0.178* | –0.071* |
| Pellets remaining in impaired pellet zone (week 1) | 0.461* | 0.620** | 0.267* | 0.599** | 0.114* | 0.441* | 0.484* | 0.712*** | 0.396* |
| Pellets remaining in impaired pellet zone (week 7) | 0.344* | 0.437* | 0.650** | 0.664** | 0.526* | 0.731*** | 0.614** | 0.733*** | 0.764*** |
aCell values are the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the intersecting behavioral task and ROI.
*p > 0.05;
**p < 0.05;
***p < 0.01;
†p < 0.001.