Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;9:e56907. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56907

Figure 3. IAV-induced barrier damage in infected high glucose co-cultures is associated with a pro-inflammatory response in endothelial cells.

(A) Left: Mean difference (MD) plot depicts the relationship between gene-wise average log expression and the log-fold change comparison between IAV and mock infected cells. DE = differentially expressed. Right: Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) plot of the endothelial cell sample used for RNASeq shows distinct clustering of samples by treatment group. (B) The number of DE expressed genes that are detected in endothelial cells derived from IAV-infected co-cultures (data collected at 24 hr post-infection). (C) Biological processes that are enriched in the endothelial cells derived from IAV-infected co-cultures at 24 hr post-infection. (D) Pro-inflammatory gene expression in co-culture endothelial cells. Data are normalised to GAPDH expression and fold change was calculated using the ΔΔCt method, expressed relative to mock infected cells. Data are mean ± SEM of an average of two technical replicates per group from a minimum of three independent experiments. (E) Levels of cytokines in the lower compartment (endothelial) cell culture supernatant 24 hr post IAV infection. Statistical significance was determined using a Mann-Whitney test. *: p<0.05. (F) Measurement of co-culture barrier integrity using TEER (Ω) readings after the addition of supernatant to the lower compartment. Supernatant was derived from the lower compartment of mock-infected or IAV-infected co-cultures with a history of 7 mM or 12 mM glucose. Harvested media was either heat treated or transferred without heat treatment. Data are shown relative to the TEER measured before the addition of the cell culture supernatant and to the TEER of wells subject to mock-infected supernatant transfer at each time point, for each glucose condition. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (with six biological replicates per group). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test. *: p<0.05.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Barrier damage is dependent on active virus.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Measurement of co-culture barrier integrity using TEER (Ω) readings following infection with medium (‘mock’), IAV or ultra-violet inactivated (UVI) IAV (4 × 1 J/cm²). Viral titration of the UV inactivated virus revealed a dose of 5 PFU/well. Data are shown relative to the TEER measured before the addition of virus, and to the TEER of wells subject to mock-infection at each time point, for each glucose condition. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of two independent experiments (with four biological replicates per group, per experiment). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test. *: p<0.05 7 mM Glucose vs 12 mM Glucose.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Barrier damage is and is not reversable via the addition of an IL-1 receptor antagonist.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

Measurement of co-culture barrier integrity using TEER (Ω) readings following infection with medium (‘mock’) or IAV in the absence and presence of Anakinra. Anakinra was added to the endothelial compartment of the co-culture 1 hr prior to IAV infection at a dose of 10 µg/mL. Data are shown relative to the TEER measured before the addition of virus, and to the TEER of wells subject to mock-infection (with and without Anakinra) at each time point, for each glucose condition. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of two independent experiments (with three biological replicates per group, per experiment). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test. *: p<0.05 compared to 7 mM Glucose condition.