Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;228:107882. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882

Table 1.

Assessment of different SC resilience strategies and influence of blockchain technology on the resilience approach.

Resiliencestrategies Approach Risk prevention/Performance improvement Influence by application scenario
Supporting source in literature
A B C
Collaboration Information sharing Enhance connectivity IT to share information Signaling potential disruptions, initiate countermeasures o ++ ++ Min (2019); Saberi et al. (2019); Swan (2015)
Social capital and relational competences Communication, cooperation, integration of SC partners Increase risk awareness, build trust (formal & informal) o + + Hull (2017); Scott et al. (2017); Wang et al., 2019a
Coopetition Sharing of demand or resources Build security and resilience, working for mutual benefit o + ++ Li et al. (2018); Lohmer (2019); Wang et al., 2019a
Contractual agreements Contracts (long/short term) to enable flexibility, sharing of risks and revenues Minimize disruption impacts (e.g., supply shortages) + + ++ Saberi et al. (2019); Wang et al., 2019a
SC Reengineering Supply chain network structure/design Constructing SC networks tailored for resilience Balancing redundancy, efficiency, vulnerability + + + Cole et al. (2019); Hull (2017); Ivanov et al. (2019); Saberi et al. (2019)
Contingency planning Reactive measures and protocols Prepare contingency plans o ++ ++ Cole et al. (2019); Ivanov et al. (2019); Saberi et al. (2019)
Creating redundancy Use of spare capacity and inventory (e.g., redundant supplier) Avoid capacity or inventory scarcity due to disruptions o o + Babich and Hilary (2020); Ivanov et al. (2019); Makhdoom et al., 2019
Agility Increasing flexibility Postponement, flexible supply base Adapt to changing requirements + + ++ Ivanov et al. (2019); Kshetri (2018); Li et al. (2018); Wang et al., 2019a
Increasing visibility Transparency across the entire SC Identify threats, react quickly to disruptions of all kinds o ++ ++ Blossey et al. (2019); Ivanov et al. (2019); Petersen et al. (2018); Wang et al., 2019a
Increasing velocity Enable rapid adaptation to new conditions Mitigate the impact of unpredictable disruption + + ++ Cole et al. (2019); Ivanov et al. (2019); Kshetri (2018); Saberi et al. (2019); Wang et al., 2019a
Miscellaneous Risk management culture Implement and develop SCRM culture Top management support for efficient SCRM strategies + + + Ivanov et al. (2019); Kshetri (2018); Saberi et al. (2019)
Increasing innovativeness Invent and seek new business models Diversification, reduce vulnerability o + + Blossey et al. (2019); Oh and Shong (2017)
Building logistic capabilities Increasing delivery speed, reliability, and cost-efficiency Logistical vulnerabilities in the SC (e.g., delays in transport) o + ++ Choi et al. (2019); Cole et al. (2019); Treiblmaier (2018)
Building security Protection of the SC (e.g., cyber-security) Reduction of theft or infiltration o + + Hull (2017); Li et al. (2018); Makhdoom et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019a

Scale: --, -, o, +, ++ corresponding to a Likert scale (--: strong negative influence of the blockchain on the efficient application of the resilience strategy, -: negative influence, o: no perceived influence on strategy execution, +: positive influence, and ++: strong positive influence).