Table 1.
Assessment of different SC resilience strategies and influence of blockchain technology on the resilience approach.
| Resiliencestrategies | Approach | Risk prevention/Performance improvement |
Influence by application scenario |
Supporting source in literature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | |||||
| Collaboration | Information sharing | Enhance connectivity IT to share information | Signaling potential disruptions, initiate countermeasures | o | ++ | ++ | Min (2019); Saberi et al. (2019); Swan (2015) |
| Social capital and relational competences | Communication, cooperation, integration of SC partners | Increase risk awareness, build trust (formal & informal) | o | + | + | Hull (2017); Scott et al. (2017); Wang et al., 2019a | |
| Coopetition | Sharing of demand or resources | Build security and resilience, working for mutual benefit | o | + | ++ | Li et al. (2018); Lohmer (2019); Wang et al., 2019a | |
| Contractual agreements | Contracts (long/short term) to enable flexibility, sharing of risks and revenues | Minimize disruption impacts (e.g., supply shortages) | + | + | ++ | Saberi et al. (2019); Wang et al., 2019a | |
| SC Reengineering | Supply chain network structure/design | Constructing SC networks tailored for resilience | Balancing redundancy, efficiency, vulnerability | + | + | + | Cole et al. (2019); Hull (2017); Ivanov et al. (2019); Saberi et al. (2019) |
| Contingency planning | Reactive measures and protocols | Prepare contingency plans | o | ++ | ++ | Cole et al. (2019); Ivanov et al. (2019); Saberi et al. (2019) | |
| Creating redundancy | Use of spare capacity and inventory (e.g., redundant supplier) | Avoid capacity or inventory scarcity due to disruptions | o | o | + | Babich and Hilary (2020); Ivanov et al. (2019); Makhdoom et al., 2019 | |
| Agility | Increasing flexibility | Postponement, flexible supply base | Adapt to changing requirements | + | + | ++ | Ivanov et al. (2019); Kshetri (2018); Li et al. (2018); Wang et al., 2019a |
| Increasing visibility | Transparency across the entire SC | Identify threats, react quickly to disruptions of all kinds | o | ++ | ++ | Blossey et al. (2019); Ivanov et al. (2019); Petersen et al. (2018); Wang et al., 2019a | |
| Increasing velocity | Enable rapid adaptation to new conditions | Mitigate the impact of unpredictable disruption | + | + | ++ | Cole et al. (2019); Ivanov et al. (2019); Kshetri (2018); Saberi et al. (2019); Wang et al., 2019a | |
| Miscellaneous | Risk management culture | Implement and develop SCRM culture | Top management support for efficient SCRM strategies | + | + | + | Ivanov et al. (2019); Kshetri (2018); Saberi et al. (2019) |
| Increasing innovativeness | Invent and seek new business models | Diversification, reduce vulnerability | o | + | + | Blossey et al. (2019); Oh and Shong (2017) | |
| Building logistic capabilities | Increasing delivery speed, reliability, and cost-efficiency | Logistical vulnerabilities in the SC (e.g., delays in transport) | o | + | ++ | Choi et al. (2019); Cole et al. (2019); Treiblmaier (2018) | |
| Building security | Protection of the SC (e.g., cyber-security) | Reduction of theft or infiltration | o | + | + | Hull (2017); Li et al. (2018); Makhdoom et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019a | |
Scale: --, -, o, +, ++ corresponding to a Likert scale (--: strong negative influence of the blockchain on the efficient application of the resilience strategy, -: negative influence, o: no perceived influence on strategy execution, +: positive influence, and ++: strong positive influence).