Table 2.
Percent change in wave 1 amplitudes relative to 40/s conventional stimulus design
| Probability (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stim. Design | Species | Freq. (kHz) | Mean | (95 % CI) | < ± 5 % | < ± 10 % |
| 40/s int. ramp | Gerbil | 2.8 | 22 | (6 to 40) | 1 | 7 |
| 5.7 | 23 | (10 to 37) | 0 | 2 | ||
| Mouse | 11.3 | 26 | (12 to 39) | 0 | 1 | |
| 22.6 | 26 | (10 to 44) | 0 | 2 | ||
| 80/s int. ramp | Gerbil | 2.8 | 19 | (2 to 36) | 4 | 15 |
| 5.7 | 8 | (−4 to 21) | 31 | 63 | ||
| Mouse | 11.3 | 12 | (1 to 25) | 12 | 37 | |
| 22.6 | 21 | (3 to 38) | 2 | 9 | ||
| 80/s conv. | Gerbil | 2.8 | −23 | (−36 to −10) | 0 | 2 |
| 5.7 | −23 | (−34 to −12) | 0 | 1 | ||
| Mouse | 11.3 | −20 | (−31 to −10) | 0 | 3 | |
| 22.6 | −13 | (−27 to 2) | 12 | 33 | ||
Negative values indicate the amplitude measurement was lower than for 40/s conventional. Significance is assessed by the posterior probability that the change in wave 1 amplitude from 40/s conventional is less than ±5 or ±10 %.