Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;21(3):225–242. doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00754-3

Table 7.

Change in ABR thresholds for 80/s interleaved plateau and interleaved random stimulus designs in decibel (dB) relative to 80/s interleaved ramp

Probability (%)
Stim. Design Species Freq. (kHz) Mean (95 % CI) < ± 2.5 dB < ± 5 dB
Int. plateau Gerbil 2 −3.4 (−6.4 to −0.0) 30 83
2.8 0.7 (−2.7 to 4.2) 82 99
4 −0.5 (−3.8 to 3.1) 83 99
5.7 0.7 (−2.8 to 4.0) 82 99
8 −1.1 (−4.4 to 2.1) 78 99
Mouse 8 1.4 (−1.1 to 4.0) 79 100
11.3 1.1 (−1.6 to 3.7) 85 100
16 0.1 (−2.4 to 2.9) 94 100
22.6 0.7 (−1.7 to 3.5) 90 100
32 1.1 (−1.6 to 3.6) 85 100
Int. random Gerbil 2 2.6 (−0.5 to 5.9) 47 93
2.8 3.8 (0.2 to 7.1) 22 75
4 2.6 (−0.7 to 6.1) 47 92
5.7 2 (−1.4 to 5.3) 61 96
8 3.8 (0.5 to 7.4) 22 76
Mouse 8 2.9 (0.4 to 5.6) 37 94
11.3 4.3 (1.7 to 6.8) 8 70
16 1.9 (−0.6 to 4.5) 68 99
22.6 2.2 (−0.4 to 4.8) 59 98
32 2.9 (0.5 to 5.7) 38 94

Negative values indicate the threshold was lower than for 80/s interleaved ramp. Significance is assessed by the posterior probability that the difference in threshold from interleaved ramp is less than ±2.5 or ±5 dB.