Table 8.

Percent change in wave 1 amplitudes for 80/s interleaved plateau and interleaved random stimulus designs relative to 80/s interleaved ramp

					Probability (%)
Stim. Design	Species	Freq. (kHz)	Mean	(95 % CI)	< ± 5 %	< ± 10 %
Int. plateau	Gerbil	2	−7	(−16 to 2)	31	72
		2.8	−1	(−21 to 19)	39	68
		4	19	(−3 to 41)	8	21
		5.7	2	(−12 to 18)	48	80
		8	−1	(−15 to 14)	48	81
	Mouse	8	−8	(−19 to 3)	26	62
		11.3	−8	(−14 to −1)	20	75
		16	−14	(−22 to −4)	3	22
		22.6	−1	(−10 to 8)	73	97
		32	31	(16 to 47)	0	0
Int. random	Gerbil	2	−3	(−12 to 7)	61	93
		2.8	12	(−8 to 34)	22	44
		4	15	(−6 to 36)	16	34
		5.7	38	(20 to 58)	0	0
		8	24	(8 to 42)	1	4
	Mouse	8	13	(2 to 26)	8	30
		11.3	8	(1 to 14)	23	76
		16	1	(−8 to 11)	69	95
		22.6	7	(−2 to 16)	38	77
		32	34	(19 to 51)	0	0

Negative values indicate the amplitude measurement was lower than for 80/s interleaved ramp. Significance is assessed by the posterior probability that change in wave 1 amplitude from 80/s interleaved ramp is less than ±5 or ±10 %.