Table 5.

Multi-level regression results explaining the association between the perceived availability of age-friendly community features and functional limitation

	Whole sample			Young-old			Old-old
	OR	(SE)		OR	(SE)		OR	(SE)
Housing	1.60	(0.27)	**	1.66	(0.35)	*	1.41	(0.44)
Outdoor spaces and buildings	0.47	(0.09)	***	0.56	(0.13)	*	0.34	(0.11)	**
Transportation	0.68	(0.13)	†	0.63	(0.16)	†	0.59	(0.21)
Health and wellness	1.22	(0.24)		0.45	(0.35)		1.06	(0.39)
Social participation and inclusion	0.67	(0.13)	*	0.51	(0.13)	**	1.26	(0.46)
Volunteering and civic engagement	1.03	(0.20)		1.04	(0.25)		0.86	(0.31)
Job opportunities	1.00	(0.18)		1.03	(0.21)		1.10	(0.37)
Community information	1.33	(0.27)		1.31	(0.32)		1.04	(0.40)
Age	0.99	(0.01)	*	0.95	(0.01)	***	1.07	(0.02)	***
Gender (ref: male)
Female	0.92	(0.09)		0.96	(0.11)		0.90	(0.16)
Marital status (ref: married/partnered)
Separated/divorced/widowed	0.98	(0.10)		1.03	(0.13)		0.90	(0.18)
Never married	0.83	(0.13)		0.80	(0.14)		0.83	(0.46)
Working status (ref: not working)
Working	0.22	(0.03)	***	0.16	(0.02)	***	0.53	(0.18)	†
Race/ethnicity (ref: non-Hispanic White)
Non-Hispanic Black	0.93	(0.11)		0.90	(0.12)		1.22	(0.28)
Hispanic	0.89	(0.14)		1.29	(0.35)		0.45	(0.29)
Educational attainment	0.95	(0.02)	†	0.96	(0.03)		0.92	(0.04)	†
Total household income	0.74	(0.02)	***	0.72	(0.03)	***	0.86	(0.05)	*
Social interaction	1.00	(0.03)		1.08	(0.04)	†	0.81	(0.05)	**
Length in the current community	0.99	(0.03)		0.98	(0.03)		0.98	(0.05)
N	3650			2788			862

†p < .10; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001