Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;10:1249. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01249

Table 2.

Clinical trials of the approved EGFR antibody drugs.

Tumor type Drug X Combination therapy drugs Route, dose Comparison (medication group and control group) Efficacy (PR, OS, PFS et), survival benefit = months Safety (list grade III and IV adverse events) Phase I, II, III (n) References/
clinical trials
Metastatic colorectal cancer Cetuximab Irinotecan Initially 400 mg/m2 followed by weekly 250 mg/m2 Cetuximab combined with irinotecan (218) vs. irinotecan (111) PR 22.9 vs. PR 10.8% Grade III and IV adverse events 65.1 vs. 43.5% Phase II (329) (43)
Colorectal cancer Cetuximab BSC Initially 400 mg/m2 to weekly infusions at 250 mg/m2 Cetuximab plus BSC (287) vs. BSC (285) OS = 6.1 vs. 4.6
KRAS wild type
OS = 9.5 vs. 4.8
Grade III and IV adverse events 78.5 vs. 59.1% Randomized Phase III (572) (44)
Head and neck squamous cell cancer Cetuximab XRT 400 mg/m2 initial dose to followed weekly doses at 250 mg/m2 RT (213) vs. RT plus Cetuximab (211) OS = 29.3 vs. 49.0 Received cetuximab had a greater number of grade 3 and 4 infusion reactions (3%) Phase III (424) (45)
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Cetuximab Panitumab Cetuximab 2.5, 25, 62.5 mg/m2 panitumumab-0.06, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg,. Cetuximab (n = 12) vs. panitumab (n = 15) NR Cetuximab-IRDye800CW and panitumumab-IRDye800CW grade 1 adverse events, respectively, is 15 and 1 Phase I (27) (46)
Advanced NSCLC Cetuximab Carboplatin and paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 weekly after loading dose Cetuximab vs. control Median OS = 5.4 vs. 4.8 210 [37%] in the cetuximab group vs. 158 [25%] in the control group Phase 3 (277) (47)
SCCHN Cetuximab Nivolumab 250 mg/m2 weekly after loading dose Cetuximab + IC vs. Nivolumab+ Cetuximab OS = 5.1 vs. 7.1 Favored nivolumab vs. IC Phase 3 (361) NCT02105636
Metastatic colorectal cancer Panitumumab BSC Panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks Panitumumab plus
BSC (231) vs. BSC (232)
PR = 8 vs. 0% Skin Toxicity 3/414 vs. 0% Phase III (463) (48)
Metastatic colorectal cancer Panitumumab FOLFOX4 Intravenously (IV) over 1 h at 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks on day Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 vs. FOLFOX4 (1:1) PFS = 9.6 vs. 8.0
OS = 23.9 vs. 19.7
Grade 3/4: 96 vs. 31% Phase III (1,183) (49)
KRAS wild-type biliary cancer. Panitumumab Cisplatin and gemcitabine 9 mg/kg BW, i.v q3w Cisplatin and gemcitabine + panitumumab (A) vs. cisplatin + gemcitabine (B) PFS = 54 vs. 73% OS = 12.8 months (arm A) vs. 20.1 months (arm B) Neutropenia26 (44%) vs. 13 (47%) Phase II (90) (50)
Confirmed metastatic colon or rectum adenocarcinoma Panitumumab BSC 6.0 mg /kg Panitumumab with BSC, n = 142; vs. BSC, n = 128 PFS = 5.2 vs. 1.7 OS = 10.2 vs. 7.4 PAN WITH BSC 46.4% vs. BSC18.7 Phase III (270) (51)
HNSCC Nimotuzumab Cisplatin Nimotuzumab (200 mg/week) CRT + nimotuzumab (20) vs. CRT (20) vs. RT + nimotuzumab (17) vs. RT groups (19) CR = 90 vs. 70 vs. 70.59 vs. 31.01%
PR = 10 vs. 0 vs. 5.88 vs. 5.26%
Grade 3/4: 55 vs. 25 vs. 59 vs. 84% Phase IIb (92) (52)
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nimotuzumab Chemoradiotherapy 200 mg, iv weekly for 7 courses Single-arm treated with induction chemotherapy, sequential Nimotuzumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy OS = 85.6% LRC = 97.8% PFS = 79.5% Neutropenia (35.5)
Thrombocytopenia (17.7)
Phase II (45) (53)
Advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer Nimotuzumab Paclitaxel and cisplatin Nimotuzumab 200 mg weekly Single arm RR = 51.8% DCR = 92.9% OS = 14.0 months Alopecia (78.6%)
Neutropenia (46.4%), nausea (48.3%)
Phase II (56) (54)
Non-small-cell lung cancer Necitumumab Paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy Necitumumab 800 mg, on days 1 and 8 Neci with Pac-Carb (n = 110) vs. Pac-Carb (n = 57) PFS = 5.4 vs. 5.6
OS = 13.2 vs. 11.2
Grade 3/4: 65.1% vs. 69.1% Phase II (167) (55)
Non-small-cell lung cancer Necitumumab. Gemcitabine and cisplatin Administered IV on days 1 and 8 (necitumumab continuation arm) Necitumumab Continuation (n = 261) vs. Gemcitabine-Cisplatin non-progressors (n = 215) Median OS = 15.9 vs. 15.0 months; median PFS = 7.4 vs. 6.9 months; 185 (70.9) 114 (53) Phase III (476) (56)

BSC, best supportive care; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FOLFOX, folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil, oxaliplatin; FU, fluorouracil; HNSCC, head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma; NR, not reported; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PR, Response rate; OS: Median overall survival; DCR, disease control rate; LCR, locoregional control; PFS, Median progression free survival; XRT, X-ray Radiation Therapy; RT, Radiation Therapy; OR, Overall Response; IC, Investigator's choice.