Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;10:1249. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01249

Table 3.

Clinical trials of the un-approved EGFR antibodies.

Tumor type Drug X Combination therapy drugs Route, dose Comparison (medication group and control group) Efficacy (n/N, % of CR, PR, SD, NR), survival benefit = months Safety (list grade III and IV adverse events) Phase I, II, III (n) References/
clinical trials
Recurrent glioblastoma Depatuxizumab mafodotin Temozolomide Depatux-m (0.5–1.5 mg/kg) Single arm increments OR was 14.3%, PFS was 25.2%, and OS was 69.1%. Grades 3/4 AEs occurring in 22% of patients Phase I multicenter trial (60) (63)
Advanced solid tumors Depatuxizumab (ABT-806) NR 2 mg/kg every other week (eow) to escalate to 6, 12, 18, and 24 mg/kg eow. Single arm increments Median time to progression was 55 vs. 43 days. No OR occurred Grade 3/4 AEs n = 11 (22%) Phase I (49) (64)
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Duligotuzumab Cetuximab Duligotuzumab (1,100 mg IV, q2w) Both arms (duligotuzumab vs. cetuximab 59:62) PFS was 4.2 vs. 4.0 months; HR: 1.23, OS was 7.2 vs. 8.7 months; HR 1.15 and ORR (12 vs. 14.5%) Duligotuzumab vs. cetuximab, and GI disorders (17 vs. 7%), infections (22 vs. 11.5%) Phase II (121) (65)
Metastatic colorectal cancer Sym004 (futuximab + modotuximab) BSC or 5-FU or Capecitabine A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)
B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)
A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)
B:Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)
C: Standard of Care
OS = 7.9 vs. 10.3 vs. 9.6
CR = 0 (0) vs. 0 (0) vs. 1 (1.2)
PR = 11 (13.3) vs. 8 (9.3) vs. 1 (1.2)
A: 58 (69.9%) vs. B: 41 (48.8%) vs. C: 9 (11.5%) Phase II (254) NCT02083653
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Imgatuzumab (GA201) Cetuximab Imgatuzumab (700 mg) or (1,400 mg) Imgatuzumab (700 mg) vs. Imgatuzumab (1,400 mg) vs. Cetuximab Downregulation of EGFR−35% [700 mg]; −42% [1,400 mg]; −21% [cetuximab] 10 (48%) vs. 14 (70%) vs. 10 (56%) n = 59 (66)
Advanced gastric and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas Matuzumab (EMD 72000) 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (PLF) 400 mg matuzumab in combination with PLF or 800 mg matuzumab 400 mg dose n = 7; 800 mg dose n = 8 The best confirmed overall response rate was 26.7% 0 (0) vs. 2 (13.3%) Phase I (15) (67)
Advanced non-small cell lung cancer Nimotuzumab (h-R3) Gefitinib 200 mg, i.v. weekly Nimotuzumab plus gefitinib (78) vs. gefitinib alone (77) PR = 13 (16.7%) vs. 17 (22.1%)
SD = 29 (37.2%) vs. 33 (42.9%)
OS = 14.0 (9.7–18.2) vs. 13.5 (11.3–15.7)
11 (14.3%) vs. 12 (15.6%) Phase II (155) (68)
Squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck Zalutumumab Best supportive care Initially 8 mg/kg and followed doses of 4 mg/kg Zalutumumab plus BSC (191) vs. BSC alone (95) OS = 6.7 (5.8–7.0) vs. 5.2 (4.1–6.4) (39 [21%] vs. 0) Phase III (286) (69)
Solid tumors Tomuzotuximab NR Weekly (12–1,370 mg) or 2-weekly (990 mg) A three-plus-three dose escalation design. 12 SD, 1 PR, 1 CR, and 2 prolonged control of their non-measurable disease. Infusion-related reactions 3 grade, 12% Phase I (41) (70)

BSC, best supportive care; FOLFOX, folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil, oxaliplatin; FU, fluorouracil; HNSCC, head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma; NR, not reported; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PR, Response rate; OS, Median overall survival; PFS, Median progression free survival; DCR, disease control rate; CR, complete response; XRT, X-ray Radiation Therapy; RT, Radiation Therapy.