Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;58:102933. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102933

Table 3.

Performance of models for brain invasion prediction.

Cohort Model AUC ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%) PPV NPV
Training set T1C 0.682(0.645–0.719) 64.77(61.85–67.70) 61.42(55.37–67.52) 65.81(62.55–69.06) 0.359(0.313–0.404) 0.846(0.817–0.874)
T2 0.742(0.708–0.776) 73.46(70.90–76.06) 57.87(52.03–64.0) 78.31(75.54–81.05) 0.454(0.400–0.509) 0.857(0.832–0.882)
Radiomic 0.855(0.829–0.882) 76.92(74.40–79.50) 80.32(75.56–85.25) 75.86(72.90–78.84) 0.509(0.461–0.558) 0.925(0.906–0.945)
Clinicoradiomic 0.857(0.831–0.883) 79.35(76.93–81.76) 72.83(67.34–78.40) 81.37(78.65–84.05) 0.549(0.494–0.603) 0.906(0.885–0.927)
Validation set T1C 0.735(0.682–0.789) 57.90(54.18–61.58) 86.42(78.84–93.95) 53.90(49.87–57.90) 0.208(0.164–0.251) 0.966(0.946–0.986)
T2 0.717(0.661–0.772) 54.71(51.07–58.43) 88.89(82.02–95.69) 49.91(46.0–53.90) 0.199(0.159–0.240) 0.970(0.950–0.990)
Radiomic 0.796(0.747–0.845) 73.25(69.86–76.59) 79.01(70.19–87.95) 72.44(68.77–76.04) 0.287(0.228–0.345) 0.961(0.943–0.979)
Clinicoradiomic 0.819(0.775–0.863) 65.96(62.38–69.60) 90.12(83.39–96.97) 62.56(58.65–66.52) 0.253(0.204–0.302) 0.978(0.963–0.994)

Note: Radiomic, combination of T1C and T2; Clinicoradiomic, fusion of radiomic signature and sex information; T1C, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging; T2, T2-weighted imaging; ACC, balanced accuracy; AUC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.