Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May 5;70:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.04.015

Table 3.

Comparison of measurements of the lens and ocular geometry obtained for C57BL/6 mice of the same age as in the current study with previously published studies.

Lens parameters Study Values Method
LT This study 1.90 (0.01) In-vivo, MRI
Schmucker & Schaeffela [43] 1.95 Ex-vivo, Microscopy
Tkatchenko et al. [44] 1.94 (0.24) In-vivo, MRI
Ra This study 1.30 (0.27) In-vivo, MRI
Schmucker & Schaeffela [43] 1.1 Ex-vivo, Microscopy
Rp This study −1.28 (0.02) In-vivo, MRI
Schmucker & SchaeffeT [43] −1.02 Ex-vivo, Microscopy
Other biometry
ACD This study 0.35 (0.02) In-vivo, MRI
Schmucker & Schaeffela [43] 0.24 Ex-vivo, Microscopy
Tkatchenko et al. [44] 0.38 (0.03) In-vivo, MRI
VCD
This study 0.60 (0.01) In-vivo, MRI
Schmucker & Schaeffela [43] 0.70 Ex-vivo, Microscopy
Tkatchenko et al. [44] 0.91 (0.36) In-vivo, MRI
a

Data were predicted from published age trends. Values were expressed as mean (SD).