Skip to main content
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth logoLink to BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
. 2020 Jul 30;20:438. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03120-6

Correction to: Perinatal outcomes in Finnish twins: a retrospective study

Annu-Riikka Susanna Rissanen 1,, Riina Maria Jernman 2, Mika Gissler 3,4, Irmeli Katriina Nupponen 5, Mika Erkki Nuutila 2
PMCID: PMC7393739  PMID: 32731890

Correction to: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2, 20 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2670-3

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified some errors in the Results and Discussion sections.

The Results and Discussion sections have been replaced with the updated version and the changes have been highlighted in bold typeface.

Results

Paragraph 8

Respiratory distress syndrome was more common in twin B (p < 0.001). Twin B ended up in a respirator (p < 0.001) more often but the amount of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy diagnoses did not differ between twin A and B. Twin B also received more antibiotics than twin A (p = 0.002) and was more often admitted to NICU (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3) even though both the admittance rate to NICU and antibiotic use have risen markedly during the years for both twins (p < 0.001 for both). Sepsis diagnoses have, however, remained stable. Phototherapy was needed equally for both twins, but the amount of twin B at home by the age of seven days was significantly lower than twin A (p = 0.006).

Discussion

Paragraph 5, sentence 3

The short-term morbidity in particular seems to be higher for twin B with possible consequences on early interaction.

Reference

  • 1.Rissanen AS, et al. Perinatal outcomes in Finnish twins: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:2. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2670-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES