Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;76(4):789–810. doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00451-y

Table 2.

A categorization of climate and corona policies, our main conclusions and references to appendix sections

Corona policies Climate policies
Stimulus spending Stimulus spending
Helicopter money, monetary stimulus and other redistribution (bad-to-good, unknown, A.3) Small scale green infrastructure investment (good, good, A.4)
Aiding industries (see Table 3 and Fig. 3 for a sector specific evaluation) Large scale green infrastructure investment (neutral-to-good, good, A.4) Renewables R&D investment (neutral-to-good, good, A.5)
Planting trees and maintaining national parks (very good, good, A.6)
Tax reform Tax reform
Reduced labor taxes (good, neutral, A.7) Revenue-neutral carbon pricing (good, very good, A.8)
Tighter emissions caps (good, very good, A.11)
Abolishing fossil fuel subsidies (good, very good, A.9)
Taxing meat consumption (good, good, A.10)
Cross cutting Cross cutting
Paying wages of private employees (very good, neutral-to-good, A.12) Introducing or tightening renewable portfolio standards (neutral, good, A.14)
Extending sick leave provisions (neutral-to-bad, neutral-to-bad, A.13) Tightening air pollution regulations (good, good, A.15)
Encouraging work from home (neutral, good, A.16) Promoting active modes of transportation (good, good, A.17)
Conditions on bailouts (neutral-to-good, neutral-to-good, A.18)

Conclusions summarized as (evaluation for coronavirus, evaluation for climate)