. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 31.

Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Nov 5;8(4):1443–1446.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.028

TABLE III.

Imaging indications during ED visits with HAE vs angioedema

Diagnosis	HAE diagnosis	Angioedema diagnosis
Diagnosis	% of visits (95% CI) Weighted frequency	% of visits (95% CI) Weighted frequency	Adjusted OR^* (95% CI)	P value
Pancreatitis	0.1% (0.0%-0.2%) ≤10^†	0.1% (0.1%-0.1%) 164	1.38 (0.33-5.79)	.75
Diverticulosis/diverticulitis	0.4% (0.0%-0.9%) 38	0.2% (0.1%-0.2%) 395	5.02 (1.33-18.90)	.05
Cholecystitis	0.0% (0.0%-0.0%)	0.01% (0.0%-0.02%) ≤10	—	—
Appendicitis	0.0% (0.0%-0.0%)	0.01% (0.0%-0.02%) 19	—	—
Intussusception	0.05% (0.0%-0.3%) ≤10^†	0.0% (0.0%-0.0%)	—	—
Nephrolithiasis	0.2% (0.0%-0.3%) 14	0.1% (0.1%-0.1%) 182	2.47 (0.72-8.49)	.27
Constipation	1.3% (0.7%-2.0%) 119	0.3% (0.2%-0.3%) 619	6.08 (3.38-10.95)	<.0001

Bold text indicates that the P value was statistically significant. Regression models were not constructed for cells with 0 cases.

Adjusted models adjusted for age (continuous), sex, and insurance payer.

^†

Values ≤10 are bottom-coded to preserve anonymity.