Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;7(1):e000428. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000428

Table 2.

Summary of studies comparing EUS-BD to ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction

Author (year) Study design Total no subjects Type of EUS-BD Type of stent used Technical success EUS versus ERCP rate, % (n=#) Clinical success EUS versus ERCP rate, % (n=#) Total Adverse Events EUS-BD versus ERCP rate, % (n=#)
Tonozuka72 (2013) Single Centre, Retrospective 11 (8 EUS-BD; 3 ERCP) EUS-CDS EUS-HGS
EUS‐CAS
FCSEMS 100 (8/8) vs 100 (3/3) 100 (8/8) vs 100 (3/3) 37.5 (3/8) vs 0
Hamada78 (2014) Multicentre, Retrospective 20 (7 EUS-BD; 13 ERCP) EUS-CDS
EUS-HGS
SEMS
Plastic
14 (1/7) vs 7.6 (1/13)
Dhir77
(2015)
Multicentre, Retrospective 208 (104 EUS-BD;104 ERCP) EUS-CDS
EUS-AG
FCSEMS
UCSEMS
93.3 (97/104) vs 94.2 (98/104) 89.4 (93/104) vs 91.3 (95/104) 8.7 (9/104) vs 8.7 (9/104)
Kawakubo80 (2016) Single Centre, Retrospective 82 (26 EUS-BD; 56 ERCP) EUS-CDS PCSEMS  - 96.2 (25/26) vs 98.2 (55/56) 26.9 (7/26) vs
35.7 (20/56)
Bang75
(2018)
Single Centre, Prospective, RCT 67 (33 EUS-BD; 34 ERCP) EUS-CDS FCSEMS 90.9 (30/33) vs 94.1 (32/34) 97 (32/33) vs 91 (31/34) 21.2 (7/33) vs 14.7 (5/34)
Hamada79 (2018) Multicentre, Retrospective 110 (20 EUS; 90 ERCP) EUS-CDS
EUS-HGS
FCSEMS
PCSEMS
UCSEMS
 -  - 35% (7/20) vs 8.8% (8/90)
Paik73
(2018)
Multicentre, Prospective, RCT 125 (64 EUS-BD; 61 ERCP) EUS-CDS
EUS-HGS
Hybrid PCSEMS 93.8 (60/64) vs 90.2 (55/61) 90 (54/60) vs 94.5 (52/55) 10.9 (7/64) vs 39 (24/61)
Park74
(2018)
Single Centre, Prospective, RCT 28 (14 EUS-BD; 14 ERCP) EUS-CDS PCSEMS 92.8 (13/14) vs 100 (14/14) 92.8 (13/14) vs 100 (14/14) 0 vs 0
Yamao82
(2018)
Multicentre, Retrospective 39 (14 EUS-BD; 25 ERCP) EUS-CDS
EUS-HGS
FCSEMS
PCSEMS
Plastic
100 (14/14) vs 56 (14/25) 92.9 (13/14) vs 52 (13/25) 57 (8/14) vs 32 (8/25)
Nakai81 (2019) Multicentre, Prospective 59 (34 EUS-BD; 25 ERCP) EUS-CDS FCSEMS
PCSEMS
97 (33/34) 100 (34/34) 15 (5/34)

ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EUS-AG, EUS-guided antegrade stenting; EUS-BD, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage; EUS-CAS, EUS‐guided choledochoantrostomy; EUS-CDS, EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy; EUS-HGS, EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy; FCSEMS, fully covered SEMS; PCSEMS, partially covered SEMS; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SEMS, self-expanding metal stents; UCSEMS, uncovered SEMS.