Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as: Astrophys J. 2016 Nov 30;832(2):183. doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/183

Table 10.

Same as Table 9

αCE Tides aCBP,PCE (au) eCBP,PCE Notes
Mode Median Range Mode Median Range
Kepler-64 [aCBP,0 = 0.65]
0.5 NTCP 0.82 0.82 0.25 0.25 0.22–0.27
0.5f TCP 0.72 0.72 0.02 0.02
1.0 NTCP 1.58 1.58 0.31 0.33 0.31–0.35
1.0f TCP 0.91 0.91 0.01 0.01
3/5/10 NTCP 1.83 1.83 0.3 0.35 0.31–0.39
3/5/10 TCP 1.9 1.9 0.02 0.02
Kepler-1647b [aCBP,0 = 2.71]
0.5 NTCP 2.520.01+1.53 3.55 2.33–40.61 0.70.08+0.02 0.71 0.62–0.95a 27% ejected
0.5f TCP 3.10.01+0.19 3.19 3.08–3.3 0.110.08+0.01 0.07 0.02–0.12
1.0 NTCP 3.910.01+0.67 4.45 3.83–20.27 0.720.01+0.22 0.81 0.71–0.95 27% ejected
1.0f TCP 4.1 4.1 0.07 0.07
3/5/10 NTCP 4.70.26+0.63 4.93 4.29–19.14 0.70.01+0.19 0.76 0.57–0.95 4% ejected
3/5/10 TCP 4.93 4.93 0.08 0.08
Kepler-1647c
5.0e NTCP 7.90.7+6.3 9.9 7.2–55.9 0.480.1+0.9 0.55 0.2–0.95 82% ejected
10.0e NTCP 7.70.8+4.0 9.2 6.9–31.1 0.320.08+0.25 0.54 0.24–0.95 81% ejected
10.0 TCP 100% ejected
Kepler-35d [aCBP,0 = 0.60]
0.5 NTCP 0.94 0.94 0.37 0.37 0.33–0.41
0.5 TCP 0.95 0.95 0.03 0.03
1/3/5/10 NTCP 0.94 0.94 0.27 0.27 0.18–0.39
1/3/5/10 TCP 0.95 0.95 0.02 0.02

Notes.

a

Given the large parameter space and the associated uncertainties, we consider e > 0.95 as ejection.

b

Primary RLOF and CE.

c

Secondary RLOF and CE.

d

Experiences CE for Z − 1σZ.

e

Nonnormal PDF with multiple peaks of comparable strength, with mode not well defined.