Abstract
Purpose of the Review:
Humans and their commensal microbiota coexist in a complex ecosystem molded by evolutionary and ecological factors. Ecological opportunity is the prospective, lineage specific characteristic of an environment that contains both niche availability leading to persistence and niche discordance that drives selection within that lineage. The newborn gut ecosystem represents vast ecological opportunity. Herein, factors affecting perinatal infant microbiome composition are discussed.
Recent findings:
Establishing a healthy microbiota in early life is required for immunological programming and prevention of both short- and long-term health outcomes. The holobiont theory infers that host genetics contributes to microbiome composition. However, in most human studies environmental factors are predominantly responsible for microbiome composition and function. Key perinatal elements are route of delivery, diet and the environment in which that infant resides. Vaginal delivery seeds an initial microbiome and breastfeeding refines the community by providing additional microbes, human milk oligosaccharides and immunological proteins.
Summary:
Early life represents an opportunity to implement clinical practices that promote the optimal seeding and feeding of the gut microbial ecosystem. These include reducing non-emergent cesarean deliveries, avoiding the use of antibiotics, and promoting exclusive breastfeeding.
Keywords: microbiota, nutrition, breastfeeding, human milk oligosaccharides
INTRODUCTION
Over the past decade, cataloguing the composition of the human microbiome across the life span has emerged as one of the most compelling areas of human clinical medicine [1, 2]. Application of high throughput sequencing methods enabled taxonomical phenotyping based on variable regions of the 16S ribosomal rRNA (rRNA) due to the pioneering work of Carl Woese and George Fox [3]. More recently, whole-genome shotgun sequencing and other ‘omic approaches (metatranscriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics) have been applied to better understand the diversity of microbes present in the gut and their metabolic potential [4]. It is well accepted that the human gut microbiome is an abundant and complex collection of bacteria, archaea, phages, and single-cell eukaryotes (protozoa and fungi) [2, 4].
This rapidly expanding body of research has changed the clinical paradigm of host-microbe interactions primarily being focused on pathogens and preventing infections to an appreciation of the fundamental role of the microbiome in shaping human development and health [2, 5, 6]. While the field has rapidly advanced in its understanding of “who is there”, the genetic and environmental factors that determine which species colonize and persist over time within an individual is less well described and is currently an active area of scientific investigation [2]. The findings from this research will have clinical, scientific and, ultimately, regulatory implications [2, 7, 8] as novel food [8–10], probiotic or microbial transplant [7] intervention strategies are developed to influence the gut microbiome and host health through personalized medicine [2, 11].
EVOLUTIONAL AND ECOLOGICAL FACTORS
Research conducted using germ-free and gnotobiotic animals have demonstrated the essential role of the microbiome in proper immune [12, 13], metabolic [12] and neural/cognitive [14] development, and growth [15, 16]. The microbiota are not only critical for optimal development of the host under normal physiological growth, but also important to ensure proper host development during nutrient scarcity or disease conditions [16]. Exposure to microbes, and their specific microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPS) within the first 6 months of life is essential for establishing infant gut and immune maturation [reviewed in 13] and disrupted establishment of this ‘microbial organ’ has implications for life-long health [2, 17–19].
Evolutionary [20] and ecological [13, 20, 21] theories have been applied to provide frameworks in which to study how microbiomes assemble and interact with the host. The human body and its resident microbiota can be viewed as a “holobiont” and their collective genomes as a “hologenome”, which exist within a complex ecosystem that is under selection pressure to minimize conflict between the host and symbionts [22]. Foster and colleagues proposed that symbionts typically evolve to compete within the host system, whereas hosts evolve to keep the ecosystem “on a leash” [23]. Bacterial co-evolution with the host could occur over longer periods of time [24]. However, given the rapid generation times and estimated mutation rates of bacteria, it was proposed that bacteria and bacteriophages could evolve within the host over periods of weeks and months [20], which was recently confirmed [25, 26]. Within hosts, genetic differences that accumulate over 6-month timescales are most commonly due to resident strains acquiring a smaller number of putative evolutionary changes, in which nucleotide variants or gene gains or losses rapidly sweep to high frequency, rather than replacement with distantly related strains [26]. Gorud and colleagues concluded that “gut bacteria can evolve on human-relevant timescales, and that connections exist between these short-term evolutionary dynamics and longer-term evolution across hosts” [26]. Host–bacterial co-evolution is illustrated by the relationship between human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) and the Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis ATCC15697, which contains a novel 43 kbp gene cluster encoding extracellular solute binding proteins, permeases and catabolic genes predicted to be active on lower molecular weight HMO [27]. This gene cluster is not present in other strains of bifidobacteria, including Bifidobacterium longum subsp. logum, and bifidobacterial species commonly found in adults [17, 27].
The holobiont theory [22] suggest that host genetics, particularly host immune mechanisms [28], plays a role in determining microbiome composition However, a study of the genotype and microbiota of 1046 individuals with several distinct ancestral origins, but who shared a relatively common environment, founds that gut microbiota composition was not associated with ancestry [29]. Thus, many studies have taken an ecological approach to uncovering the environmental factors that affect microbiome composition. Ecological concepts such as richness/alpha-diversity, beta-diversity, dispersion, resilience, resistance, selection and succession are routinely included in human microbiome papers [13, 17].
Early microbial colonization proceeds in succession through a process of “seeding and feeding” [17, 30]. Immediately following birth, the first colonizers are facultative and aerotolerant genera, which reduce oxygen levels in the intestine, thereby facilitating the subsequent proliferation of a complex community dominated by obligate anaerobic bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium [17, 30]. This process is influenced by both host and environmental factors, including route of delivery (vaginal vs. cesarean section), where the child is delivered (home vs. hospital), whether antibiotics are administered and how the infant is fed. The impact of these factors on infant microbiome development are well documented in other primary literature and review articles; therefore, due to space limitations, readers are referred to those manuscripts [13, 17, 31, 32].
Vertical transmission from the mother is important in seeding the infant microbiota. Bäckhed and colleagues studied the gut microbiota of 98 Swedish infants born either vaginally or by cesarean section (15% of infants) at 3 days and again at4 and 12 month postpartum [30]. The fecal microbiome of vaginally delivered newborns shared 72% of the taxonomically annotated MetaOTUs with their mother’s stool, compared to only 41% species match between cesarean-delivered infants and their mothers [30]. In addition, mother to infant transmission of Bifidobacterium was lower in cesarean-delivered infants. Additionally seeding of the infant microbiome is purported to occur through the human milk microbiome [33].
Among the most well-studied environmental factors are where people live and what they eat (Figure 1a). Fecal microbiota composition varies among populations living in different geographical locations, however, it is nearly impossible to disentangle geography from dietary patterns and cultural practices [1, 34, 35]. As populations become more urbanized, they have less intimate contact with soil, plant and animal microbiomes [21]. In addition, they are exposed to medical practices and highly processed “Western” diets that reduce microbial diversity and change microbial composition [36, 37]. A higher abundance of Prevotella commonly discriminates populations living in less industrialized settings from those in more urbanized environments [36, 37]. Yatsunenko and colleagues studied healthy populations living in the Amazonas of Venezuela, rural Malawi and in metropolitan cities in the U.S. [1]. Distinct differences in both taxa and functional genes between individuals living the U.S. compared to Venezuela and Malawi were observed across the lifespan. Overall, using UniFrac distances, an algorithm that measures similarity among microbial communities, the authors observed that: inter-individual variation was greater among children than among adults [1]. In addition, the differences in microbial composition between children and adults decreased with increasing age in all three populations, with child microbial composition evolving toward the adult by 3 years of age [1]. Despite these overall similarities among the populations, Malawian and Amerindian children and adults were more similar to one another than to U.S. children and adults [1].
Reinforcing the importance of environment, a recent study investigated what happens when seven individuals (5 adults, 2 children) moved from urban settings to a rain forest village for 16 days [38]. In this study, the initial alpha diversity the skin microbiota and the children’s fecal and oral microbiota was lower in the urban dwellers. During the rainforest period, all visitors experienced microbiota changes. For all body sites, the microbiota of the visiting children was more similar to microbiota conformations in villagers of the same age than those of the visiting adults. The results suggest higher stability in the adult microbiota, with the less resilient children’s microbiota responding more to environmental changes [38].
INFANCY – A CRITICIAL WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY TO AFFECT DEVELOPMENT AND HEALTH
Ecological opportunity within the gut ecosystem varies over time and the newborn infant gut represents a unique ecological opportunity [20]. In addition to the seeding of microbes through vaginal delivery [30] and breastfeeding [33], diet is of vital importance to feed beneficial microbes [31, 32]. Compared to adults, during infancy, the diet proceeds temporally towards greater complexity, with punctuated changes during the introduction of solid foods and complete weaning (Figure 1b). Thus, it is expected that the infant microbiome would proceed through defined periods of development. However, sufficient data sets to model this succession were previously unavailable. Stewart and colleagues analyzed longitudinal stool samples from 903 children between 3 and 46 months-of-age that were collected as part of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study [39]. The full data set included both 16S rRNA (n=12,005) and metagenomic (n=10,867) sequences. Their findings illustrate three distinct phases of microbiome progression: a developmental phase (months 3–14), a transitional phase (months 15–30), and a stable phase (months 31–46). [39]. Breastfeeding, either exclusive or partial, was the most significant factor associated with higher levels of Bifidobacterium species and weaning was associated with an increase in Firmicutes. Consistent with the findings of Bäckhed [30], mode of delivery was associated with the microbiome during the developmental phase, driven by higher levels of Bacteroides species in vaginally-delivered infants. Consistent with other studies, they also identified environmental factors including geographical location and household exposures (such as siblings and furry pets) as important covariates affecting microbiome composition [39].
CONCLUSIONS:
Clinical and epidemiologic evidence have established strong associations between the gut microbiome in early life and long-term health outcomes [13, 17, 32]. While in many cases, the mechanisms of action are waiting to be uncovered in humans, there is sufficient evidence to recommend adherence to recommended clinical practices of avoiding preterm delivery, reducing the rates of cesarean-delivery unless medically necessary, and promoting and supporting breastfeeding (Figure 2). In addition, antibiotics should be avoided unless medically necessary as a recent study showed that even a single course of amoxicillin or macrolide changed the relative abundance of bifidobacteria, enterobacteria and clostridia, and that the dysbiosis lasted for several months [40].
Due to the differences in the microbiome by mode of delivery, vaginal seeding an on-going area of investigation [41]. Vaginal seeding refers to the practice of inoculating a cotton gauze or a cotton swab with vaginal fluids to transfer the vaginal flora to the mouth, nose, or skin of a newborn infant. In 2017, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists “did not recommend or encourage vaginal seeding outside of the context of an institutional review board-approved research protocol, and it is recommended that vaginal seeding otherwise not be performed until adequate data regarding the safety and benefit of the process become available” [42].
In response to differences in the fecal microbiome composition of breast- and formula-fed infants, the practice of adding prebiotics to infant formulae has become common throughout the world [31, 32]. The effect of prebiotics on the composition of infant microbiota has been recently reviewed by our group [31, 32]; most studies show that prebiotics increase the abundance of Bifidobacterium and, sometimes, Lactobacillus compared to fecal microbiota of infants fed control formula [31, 32]. Several studies reported a decrease in opportunistic pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, enterococci, and clostridia [31, 32]. Two HMOs, 2ˊ-fucosyllactose (2ˊ-FL) and lacto-N-neoteraose (LNnT), have also been added to infant formula. Both are well-tolerated and support age-appropriate growth of infants [31, 32]. Although prebiotics are safe, they are not recommended for routine use in infant formula [43].
Similarly, while some encouraging data exist on the efficacy of probiotics on disease prevention [reviewed in 31, 32], no broad consensus exists to recommend the use of probiotics in these conditions [43, 44]. Although probiotics are safe for use in healthy infants, concerns have been raised related to the administration of probiotics early in life when gut microbiota is not fully established and long-term consequences of such administration should be carefully evaluated.
KEY POINTS:
The gut microbiota and its human host exist as a holobiont in a complex and changing ecosystem.
Environmental factors, particularly diet, are the key determinants of microbiome structure and function. The high concentrations of oligosaccharides in human milk and the presence of specific HMO-metabolizing genes in the infant-associated B. infantis represent co-evolution host and symbiont.
Reducing cesarean delivery, promoting breastfeeding and avoiding antibiotics are key modifiable clinical practices to support the establishment of a healthy microbiome.
Prebiotics and probiotics are safe for healthy infants, but not recommended for routine use by pediatric clinical societies.
At this time, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists does not recommendvaginal seeding.is by
Acknowledgements
Financial support and sponsorship
Supported in part by grant R01 DK107561 from the National Institutes of Health, USA.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING:
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, (36 months/ 2016-present) have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
- 1.Yatsunenko T, Rey F, Manary M, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 2012; 486: 222–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hadrich D Microbiome research is becoming the key better understanding health and nutrition. Front Genet 2018; 9: 212 10.3389/fgene.2018.00212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Woese CR, Fox GE. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74:5088–5590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Galloway-Peña J, Hanson B. Tools for analysis of the microbiome. Dig Dis Sci. 2020; 10.1007/s10620-020-06091-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Illiano P, Brambilla R, Parolini C. The mutual interplay of gut microbiota, diet and human disease. FEBS J 2020;10.1111/febs.15217 . doi:10.1111/febs.1521710.1111/febs.15217. doi: 10.1111/febs.15217 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6.Charbonneau MR, Blanton LV, DiGiulio DB, et al. A microbial perspective of human developmental biology. Nature 2016; 535(7610):48–55.• This article puts forth a microbial perspective of human development to suggest opportunities to redefine healthy growth and to develop innovative strategies for disease prevention and treatment.
- 7.Ossorio PN, Zhou Y. FMT and microbial medical products: Generating high-quality evidence through good governance. J Law Med Ethics 2019; 47:505–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McBurney MI, Davis C, Fraser CM, et al. Establishing what constitutes a healthy human gut microbiome: State of the science, regulatory considerations, and future directions. J Nutr 2019; 149: 1882–1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Green JM, Barratt MJ, Kinch M, Gordon JI. Food and microbiota in the FDA regulatory framework. Science 2017; 357:39–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barratt MJ, Lebrilla C, Shapiro HY, Gordon JI. The gut microbiota, food science, and human nutrition: A timely marriage. Cell Host Microbe. 2017; 22:134–141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liwinski T, Elinav E. Harnessing the microbiota for therapeutic purposes. Am J Transplant. 2019; doi: 10.1111/ajt.15753. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Wang M, Monaco MH, Donovan SM. Impact of early gut microbiota on immune and metabolic development and function. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21:380–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Laforest-Lapointe I, Arrieta MC. Patterns of early-life gut microbial colonization during human immune development: An ecological perspective. Front Immunol. 2017;8:788. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00788•• This paper eloquently integrates microbiome development and immunological programming within an ecological context.
- 14.Codagnone MG, Spichak S, O’Mahony SM, et al. Programming bugs: Microbiota and the developmental origins of brain health and disease. Biol Psychiatry 2019; 85:150–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schwarzer M Gut microbiota: puppeteer of the host juvenile growth. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2018; 21:179–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blanton LV, Charbonneau MR, Salih T, et al. Gut bacteria that prevent growth impairments transmitted by microbiota from malnourished children. Science 2016; 351(6275): 10.1126/science.aad3311 aad3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Milani C, Duranti S, Bottacini F, et al. The first microbial colonizers of the human gut: Composition, activities, and health implications of the infant gut microbiota. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2017;81(4):e00036–17. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00036-17.•• This extensive review provides an integrated overview of factors influencing establishment of the infant microbiome, potential mechanisms of host-microbe crosstalk and the relevance of key microbial players of the infant gut microbiota, in particular bifidobacteria, with respect to their role in health and disease
- 18.Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, et al. The infant gut microbiome as a microbial organ influencing host well-being. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-0781-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Butel MJ, Waligora-Dupriet AJ, Wydau-Dematteis S. The developing gut microbiota and its consequences for health. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2018; 9:590–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scanlan PD. Microbial evolution and ecological opportunity in the gut environment. Proc Biol Sci 2019; 286:20191964. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tasnim N, Abulizi N, Pither J, et al. Linking the gut microbial ecosystem with the environment: Does gut health depend on where we live? Front Microbiol 2017; 8:1935. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bordenstein SR, Theis K. Host biology in light of the microbiome: Ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biol 2015; 13(8): e1002226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Foster KR, Schluter J, Coyte KZ, Rakoff-Nahoum S. The evolution of the host microbiome as an ecosystem on a leash. Nature 2017; 548:43–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Davenport ER, Sanders JG, Song SJ, et al. The human microbiome in evolution. BMC Biol. 2017; 15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0454-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao S, Lieberman TD, Poyet M, et al. Adaptive evolution within gut microbiomes of healthy people. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(5):656–667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Garud NR, Good BH, Hallatschek O, Pollard KS. Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in the gut microbiome within and across hosts. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(1):e3000102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sela DA, Chapman J, Adeuya A, et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:18964–18969.•• This paper demonstrated the presence of a novel set of genes in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis capable of fully metabolizing lower molecular weight human milk oligosaccharides.
- 28.Khan AA, Yurkovetskiy L, O’Grady K, et al. Polymorphic immune mechanisms regulate commensal repertoire. Cell Rep 2019; 29 541–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rothschild D, Weissbro O, Barkan E. et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 2018; 555:210–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bäckhed F, Roswall J, Peng Y, et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life, Cell Host Microbe 2015; 17:852. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Davis EC, Wang M, Donovan SM. The role of early life nutrition in the establishment of gut microbial composition and function. Gut Microbes 2017; 8: 143–171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Davis EC, Dinsmoor AM, Wang M, Donovan SM. Microbiome composition in pediatric populations from birth to adolescence: Impact of dietary and prebiotic and probiotic interventions. Dig Dis Sci 2020; doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06092-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Williams JE, Carrothers JM, Lackey KA, et al. Strong multivariate relations exist among milk, oral, and fecal microbiomes in mother-infant dyads during the first six months postpartum. J Nutr. 2019; 149:902–914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stearns JC, Zulyniak MA, de Souza RJ, et al. Ethnic and diet-related differences in the healthy infant microbiome. Genome Med. 2017; 9:32. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0421-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gupta VK, Paul S, Dutta C. Geography, ethnicity or subsistence-specific variations in human microbiome composition and diversity. Front Microbiol 2017; 8; 1162 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sonnenburg JL, Sonnenburg ED. The ancestral and industrialized gut microbiota and implications for human health. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17: 383–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sonnenburg JL, Sonnenburg ED. Vulnerability of the industrialized microbiota. Science. 2019;3 66(6464). pii: eaaw9255. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw9255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ruggles KV, Wang J, Volkova A, et al. Changes in the gut microbiota of urban subjects during an immersion in the traditional diet and lifestyle of a rainforest village. MSphere 2018; 3(4), e00193–18. 10.1128/mSphere.00193-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stewart CJ, Ajami NJ, O’Brien JL, et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature 2018; 562:583–588.•• This paper analyzed longitudinal stool samples from 903 children by 16S rRNA gene (n = 12,005) and metagenomic sequencing (n = 10,867)., Three distinct phases of microbiome progression were shown: a developmental phase (months 3–14), a transitional phase (months 15–30), and a stable phase (months 31–46).
- 40.Korpela K, Salonen A, Saxen H, et al. Antibiotics in early life associate with specific gut microbiota signatures in a prospective longitudinal infant cohort. Pediatr Res. 2020; 10.1038/s41390-020-0761-5 . doi:10.1038/s41390-020-0761-510.1038/s41390-020-0761-5. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0761-5 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Dominguez-Bello MG, De Jesus-Laboy KM, Shen N, et al. Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat Med 2016; 22:250–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 725: Vaginal Seeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130:e274–e278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thomas DW, Greer FR; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. Probiotics and prebiotics in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2010; 126:1217–1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Szajewska H What are the indications for using probiotics in children? Arch Dis Child. 2016; 101:398–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
