Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;8(2):29–34. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702144

Table 1. Time-enhancement curve characteristics comparisons of enlargement and stable groups.

Parameter Enlargement group
n  = 4
Stable group
n  = 6
p -Value
Arrival time (s) 15 (13–22) 9 (7–10) 0.106
Arrival delay time (s) 13 (12–16) 7 (6–10) 0.133
Time to peak enhancement (s) 17 (14–19) 12 (11–14) 0.234
CT peak (HU) 192 (130–262) 265 (227–319) 0.352
Upslope (HU/s) 7 (7–8) 24 (17–30) 0.0247
Upslope index 0.21 (0.18–0.26) 0.72 (0.49–1.04) 0.0243
EC washout (HU/s) 1.96 (1.31–3.38) 16.6 (14.6–21.2) 0.019
EC washout index 0.07 (0.05–0.12) 0.70 (0.57–0.82) 0.019
Peak to peak time (s) 17 (16–19) 5 (4–6) 0.108
80% enhancement duration (s) 14.8 (13.7–16.1) 7.4 (6.1–7.4) 0.0195
70% enhancement duration (s) 20.7 (18.9–22.2) 8.4 (8.3–8.6) 0.0159
60% enhancement duration (s) 29.9 (27.3–33.0) 10.6 (10.1–11.7) 0.0159
AUC (HU × s) 11,909 (11,642–12,117) 12,815 (9,766–15,661) 1
CT equilibrium phase (HU) 90 (75–103) 27 (22–39) 0.019

Abbreviations: AUC, area under curve; CT, computed tomography; EC, endoleak cavity; TEC, time-enhancement curve.

Note: all data are medians. Numbers in parentheses are the interquartile range (lower quartile[Q1]–upper quartile[Q3]).