Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;20(4):842–858. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00805-5

Table 2.

Pearson correlations between the study variables, and descriptive statistics and test scores (means and standard deviations) of the total sample (n = 80)

Age (yr) a Sex (% girls) SES a Grade (% grade 3) Low VSWM load trials (% correct)a High VSWM load trials (% correct)a All VSWM trials (% correct)a Gross motor skills (factor score)a Cardiovascular fitness (stages)a
Age (yr)a 1
Sex (% girls) -0.046 1
SESa -0.081 0.022 1
Grade (% grade 3) 0.796** 0.074 0.056 1
Low VSWM load trials (% correct)a 0.048 -0.061 0.207 0.160 1
High VSWM load trials (% correct)a -0.035 0.025 0.224* 0.093 0.750** 1
All VSWM trials (% correct)a 0.008 -0.020 0.23* 0.136 0.937** 0.934** 1
Gross motor skills (factor score)a 0.268* -0.057 0.020 0.306** 0.364** 0.236* 0.322** 1
Cardiovascular fitness (stages)a 0.198 -0.257* 0.154 0.142 0.279* 0.221* 0.268* 0.494** 1
Mean (SD) or percentage 9.17 (0.62) 51.30 4.58 (1.06) 47.50 70.70 (15.97) 66.00 (15.54) 68.35 (14.74) 0.18 (1.01) 4.74 (1.91)

Note. Performance on low and high working memory significantly differed as measured with a paired sample t-test, t (80) = 4.245, p < 0.001; SES = socioeconomic status, obtained by a parental questionnaire. Level of parental education of both parents was requested and varied from 0 (no education) to 7 (postdoctoral education; Schaart, Mies, & Westerman, 2008). Average education level of both parents was used as a measure of SES. If the level of parental education was specified for only one of the parents, this level was used as a measure of SES for the child

aMean (SD); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01