Skip to main content
. 2020 May 23;94(8):2769–2784. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02783-6

Table 1.

Two-way ANOVA results of overall main effect (transfection setup) of exposure patterns depicted in Fig. 3 (ns P > 0.05; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)

Holm–Sidak’s test Mean diff. Significance Adjusted p value Output
A vs. D  − 0.3292 *** < 0.0001 Normalized
G vs. E 0.0818 ns 0.1417 Firefly Lum.
G vs. B 0.0629 ns 0.2394
B vs E.  − 0.0190 ns 0.6422
I vs. H − 0.0521 ns 0.3603 Renilla Lum.
I vs. F − 0.2244 *** < 0.0001
I vs. C 0.0597 ns 0.3603
H vs. F  − 0.1724 ** 0.0017
H vs. C 0.1118 ns 0.0544
F vs. C 0.2841 *** < 0.0001