Table 2.
Key hallmarks of NGTxC and representative international standardized tests, that can address these hallmarks
| Block | Key hallmarks /characteristics (Mechanism/ mode of action) | IATA modules | Readiness level/currently used in hazard assessmenta | Selected examples of representative standardized (or commonly used) assays |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | Receptor binding and activation also as part of hormone-mediated processes | MIE | ||
| Testing for receptor binding | A: Adopted as OECD, EU and US EPA TG |
Oestrogen Receptor (ER) Binding Assay OECD TG 493 US EPA 890.1250 |
||
| Testing for receptor agonism/antagonism | A: Adopted as OECD, EU and US EPA TG |
Oestrogen receptor (ER) transactivation assays OECD TG 455 US EPA 890.1300 |
||
| A: Adopted as OECD TG | Androgen receptor transactivation assay OECD TG 458 | |||
| B: Undergoing ISO validation 2019-current | Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) transactivation assay, US EPA METHOD 4435 (2008); JIS K 0463 (2009)(Aarts et al. 1995; Garrison et al. 1996; Han et al. 2004) | |||
| Alteration of hormone synthesis | A: Adopted as OECD and US EPA TG |
Steroidogenesis H295R Assay OECD TG 456 US EPA 890.1550 |
||
| A: Adopted as US EPA OCSPP HTGb | Aromatase US EPA 890.1200 | |||
| 1b | CYP P450 induction | MIE | B: On OECD TGP workplan: validated, draft OECD TG under consideration | HepRG® CYP induction test method (Bernasconi et al. 2019) |
| 2 | Cell proliferation |
(Sustained) proliferation, mitogenic signalling |
No in vitro TGs, no in vitro assays on the OECD TGP workplan |
Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents OECD TG 408, US EPA 870.3100 |
| A: Adopted as OECD and US EPA TG In vivo | ||||
| Test methods currently used to contribute to regulatory WoE assessment |
Cell proliferation in vivo (Ki-67) (Jouinot and Bertherat 2018) (Wood et al. 2015) Hepatic DNA synthesis and cell proliferation (US FDA 2018; Wood et al. 2015) Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) assays in vivo |
|||
| 3 | Cell transformation | Change in morphology | A: Adopted as OECD and US EPA TG |
TG 408 US EPA 870.3100 90 day in vivo histopathological features |
| A: ICH guideline | ICH S6 PART 1(ICH 2011a, b; Wang et al. 2010) | |||
| B: Validated assays not adopted as OECD TG; OECD GD (OECD 2015, 2017b) | Bhas 42 Cell Transformation Assay (OECD 2017b) | |||
| Syrian Hamster Embryo (SHE) Cell Transformation Assay(OECD 2015) | ||||
| BALB/c 3T3 Transformation Assay | ||||
| 4 | Gap junction intercellular communication |
Change in morphology, mitogenic signalling |
No TGs, no assays on the OECD TGP workplan |
|
| 5 | Indicators of oxidative stress | Inflammation, immune response, Cell injury | B: Assays in (pre) validation and on the OECD TGP workplan | Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation assay (phototoxicity) |
| Toxtracker (Hendriks et al. 2012, 2016) | ||||
| C: Test methods currently used to contribute to regulatory WoE assessment | HepG2 peroxide formation | |||
| Malondialdehyde (MDA)—Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARs) ex vivo assays | ||||
| in vivo assays, ICH (ICH 2005a, b) | ||||
| 6 |
Immunosuppression/ evasion |
Immune response | A: ICH S8 (ICH 2005a, b) and OECD TGs (TG 443) | NK cell/Host resistance and others |
| A: ICH S8(ICH 2005a, b) | TDAR- immunosuppression tier 1 screening | |||
|
A: TG 443(OECD 2018c) US EPA, OPPTSc 870.7800 Immunotoxicity. (1996) US EPA, OCSPP Test Guideline No. 870. 7800). (2013) |
||||
| 7 | Gene expression and cell signalling pathways | Inflammation, immune response, mitogenic signalling | B: Assays in (pre) validation and on the OECD TGP workplan | Toxtracker (Henriks et al. 2012, 2016) |
| 8 | Increased resistance to apoptotic cell death | Cell injury | A: OECD TG 408 |
Histopathology from TG 408 90 days studies (standard picnotic nuclei) |
|
Histopathology from single or repeated dose studies (eg TG 408 90 day studies): Use of special stains on ex vivo Tissue slices Hematoxilin/Eosin staining Fluoro-jade staining | ||||
| Caspase 3/7 activation in vivo | ||||
| DNA fragmentation | ||||
| 9 | Pathogenic angiogenesis and neoangiogenesis | Change in morphology | No TGs, no assays on the OECD TGP workplan | |
| 10 | Genetic Instability (Disturbed DNA repair, quick establishment of mutations = “mutator phenotype”) | Change in morphology Cell injury | No TGs, no assays on the OECD TGP workplan | |
| 11 | Cellular senescence/ telomerase | Change in morphology, Cell injury | No TGs, no assays on the OECD TGP workplan | |
| 12 | Metastasis (migration, intra- and extravasation), survival outside of original tissue | Tumour | No TGs, no assays on the OECD TGP workplan | |
| 13 | Epigenetic mechanisms and associated genetic instability | All | No TGs, no assays on the OECD TGP workplan | (Greally and Jacobs 2013) reviews how TGs could be augmented |
aTG readiness levels A, B, C are described in the methodology section
bOCSPP HTG: US EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Harmonized Test Guidelines
cOPPTS: US EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances