Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;10:12980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69547-1

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Sensitivity comparison between the presented sensor and traditional microwave resonator sensors. (a) Proposed sensor sensitivity test setup with a superficial material with the relative permittivity between 1 (bare resonator) and 10. (b) Traditional microwave resonator sensor with the same volume and permittivity. (c) and (d) The spectrum of both setups from sections (a) and (b) respectively as well as their resulted spectrums from MUT relative permittivity variations from εr = 1 to εr = 10. It could be seen that, frequency shift related to the proposed sensor is 700 MHz (c) in comparison with 200 MHz for the traditional sensor (d) under the same condition.