Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 1;99:190–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.058

Table 1.

Different RT-qPCR solutions evaluated for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples from COVID-19 positive patients.

Solution #Targetsa Target gene Sensitivity, % (95% CI)b FNc
TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) combined with validated primer-probe setsd 3 E 95.9 (89.9–98.9) 4
N 75.5 (65.8–83.6) 24
RdRp 77.6 (68.0–85.4) 22
LightMix® Modular SARS-CoV (COVID19) (TIB MOLBIOL) 3 E 97.9 (92.8–99.7) 2
N 78.6 (69.1–86.2) 21
RdRp 89.8 (82.0–95.0) 10
SARS-COV-2 R-GENE (BioMérieux) 3 E 65.3 (55.0–74.6) 34
N 66.3 (56.1–75.6) 33
RdRp 60.2 (49.8–70.0) 39
TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 3 ORF1ab 65.3 (55.0–74.6) 34
S 70.4 (60.3–79.2) 29
N 76.5 (66.9–84.5) 23
Genesig Real-Time PCR COVID-19 kit (Primedesign Ltd.) 1 RdRp 81.6 (72.5–88.7) 18
Real Accurate Quadruplex corona-plus PCR Kit (PathoFinder) 1 N 83.7 (74.8–90.4) 16
a

Specific primer-probes for SARS-CoV-2.

b

95% Confidence Interval.

c

False negative counts out of 98 patients.