Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2020 May 4;301:111087. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111087

Table 2:

Clusters within bilateral hippocampi for different statistical effects.

Statistical effect Cluster size F or t value2 Z value p-value (uncorrected) side Peak voxel MNI coordinates (x, y, z)
Group by time interaction 130 8.784 2.566 0.005 R3 30 −18 −21
Negative association with BDI score changes in the mindfulness group 197*4 5.411 4.022 0.00003 R 15 −10.5 −20
Negative association with PSS score changes in the mindfulness group 160* 2.748 2.451 0.007 L −24 −10.5 −27
Negative association with STAIt score changes in the mindfulness group 94 3.184 2.781 0.003 R 16.5 −7.5 −21
Negative association with BDI score changes in the control group 92 3.819 3.072 0.001 R 28.5 −18 −18
Negative association with PSS score changes in the control group 52 2.748 2.417 0.008 L −27 −39 1.5
Negative association with STAIt score changes in the control group 49 3.067 2.585 0.005 R 27 −19.5 −16.5
Positive correlation with task performance accuracy changes in the mindfulness group 80 2.847 2.553 0.005 L −25.5 −19.5 −16.5
2

F value for group by time interaction effect; t value for all the other statistical effects; F or t values, Z values and p values are of the peak voxels; p values are uncorrected.

3

R: right hippocampus; L: left hippocampus.

4*:

Cluster size passed the minimum threshold for FDR correction (p < 0.05). For statistical effects that did not have any cluster passing the minimum size threshold, only the largest cluster is presented in this table.