Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;8:e9623. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9623

Table 3. ICU special treatment of two groups.

NGS (n = 42) no-NGS (n = 53) P-value
Use of vasoactive agent, n (%) 24 (57.1) 30 (56.6) 0.958
CRRT, n (%) 9 (21.4) 7 (13.2) 0.288
ECMO, n (%) 6 (14.3) 3 (5.7) 0.177
Prone positioning, n (%) 10 (23.8) 11 (20.8) 0.722

Notes:

ICU, intensive care unit; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

There were no any differences in ICU special treatment between two groups (P > 0.05).

The chi-square test was utilized to calculate the difference between the two groups.

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.