Table 4.
Overview of papers using deep learning approaches with their working procedure and performance metrics for COVID-19 case detection.
| Reference | Modality | Method | Remarks | Performance Metrics and Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. (2020) [24] | Chest X-Ray | COVID-Net | A deep learning-based model with a total of 16,756 X-Ray images with multiclass classification (three) and also proposed a dedicated dataset of COVID19 X-Ray images named COVIDx. | Accuracy; |
| COVID-Net was able to achieve an accuracy of 92.40% for the classification of COVID19 positive cases. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| COVID-Net has achieved decent sensitivity, which is 91.0% for COVID-19 cases. | ||||
| Positive predictive value; | ||||
| The positive predictive value of this approach is 98.9%. | ||||
| Sethy et al. [25] | Chest X-Ray | ResNet50+SVM | The proposed model classified the characteristics obtained from various CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) models of the SVM (Support Vector Machine Classifier) using X-Ray images (25 COVID-19 positive and 25 Normal). The study claims that ResNet50 with the SVM classifier produces better results. | Accuracy; |
| The authors claimed that the accuracy of their model is 95.38% for COVID-19 case detection. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| 97.29% sensitivity is achieved through this model. | ||||
| Narin et al. [26] | Chest X-Ray | Deep CNN ResNet-50 | This study used three different CNN models (ResNet50, InceptionV3, and InceptionResNetV2) using 50 open access COVID-19 X-Ray images from Joseph Cohen, and 50 typical images from a Kaggle repository. Besides, their used non-COVID images are images of children aged between 1 and 5 years. | Accuracy; |
| They obtained an accuracy of 98% from their proposed model. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| The claimed that recall or sensitivity of their model is 96%. | ||||
| Specificity; | ||||
| However, this method provides 100% specificity in detecting COVD-19 patients. | ||||
| Ioannis et al. [27] | Chest X-Ray | VGG-19 | In this study, 224 approved COVID-19, 700 cases of Pneumonia, and 504 normal radiology images were used. They performed on both binary and 3-class classification using a transfer learning method. |
Accuracy; |
| They achieved a performance accuracy of 98% for the binary class problem and 93% for the 3-class problem. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| This study achieved 92% of sensitivity. | ||||
| Specificity: | ||||
| VGG-19 based approach obtained 98% of specificity. | ||||
| Hemdan et al. [28] | Chest X-Ray | COVIDx-Net | This study deployed deep learning models to diagnose COVID-19 patients using chest X-rays. It proposed a COVIDx-Net model that included seven CNN models with 50 Chest X-Ray images (25 COVID19 positives, 25 normal). | Accuracy; |
| The highest accuracy obtained among these seven CNN models is 90%. | ||||
| Precision; | ||||
| Similar to accuracy, among the seven CNN models, the highest precision achieved by this model is 100%. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| Moreover, the highest sensitivity obtained among the models is also 100%. | ||||
| Ying et al. [35] | Chest CT | DRE-Net | This approach used CT (777 COVID-19 positive, and 708 healthy) images with a deep model built into ResNet50 called DRE-Net. | Accuracy; |
| DRE-Net obtained an accuracy of 86.00%. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| This study claimed 96% of the sensitivity in COVID-19 detection. | ||||
| Precision; | ||||
| The precision value achieved by this model is 80%. | ||||
| Wang et al. [36] | Chest CT | M-Inception | The authors used the modified Inception (M-Inception) deep model using CT images containing 195 COVID-19 positive images and 258 COVID-19 negative images. |
Accuracy; |
| The obtained accuracy of this M-inception model is 82.90%. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| This study claimed that they achieved a sensitivity of 81%. | ||||
| Specificity; | ||||
| Moreover, this method provides specificity of 84%. | ||||
| Zheng et al. [37] | Chest CT | UNet+3D Deep Network | This method proposed a three-dimensional Deep CNN model to detect COVID-19 from CT images. Their dataset contains 313 COVID-19 positive images and 229 non-COVID images. | Accuracy; |
| The accuracy gained by this model is 90.80%. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| This study obtained 90.70% of sensitivity. | ||||
| Specificity; | ||||
| This model achieved 91.10% of specificity in detecting COVID-19 positive cases from CT images. | ||||
| Xu et al. [38] | Chest CT | ResNet | This study was performed in detecting COVID-19 positive cases using ResNet coupled with CT images. Their dataset contains the images of 224 Viral pneumonia and 175 healthy images | Accuracy; |
| The average accuracy achieved by the model from the perspective of CT cases as a whole is 86.7%. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| In detecting COVID-19 positive cases, this study reported 86.7% of sensitivity. | ||||
| Precision; | ||||
| The precision obtained by this model is 81.03%. | ||||
| Tulin et al. [39] | Chest X-Ray | DarkCovidNet | This proposed model is based on the DarkNet method that is completely automated with an end-to-end structure without the need for manual feature extraction. They have used a total of 1125 images (125 COVID-19 positives, 500 Pneumonia images, and 500 NoFindings images) to experiment with their developed model. | Accuracy; |
| This method obtained an accuracy of 98.08% and 87.02% for binary and three classes, respectively. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| The sensitivity achieved by this study is 85.35% and 95.13% for binary and three classes, respectively. | ||||
| Specificity; | ||||
| Similarly, the specificity is also 92.18% and 95.3% for binary and 3-classes, respectively. | ||||
| Our Proposed Framework | Chest X-Ray | Faster R–CNN | A deep learning model to detect COVID-19 cases from Chest X-Ray images using faster R–CNN models with ten folds cross-validation technique. A real-time assessment tool for COVID-19 positive case detection. The dataset contains 183 COVID-19 positive X-Ray images and 13617 non-COVID X-Ray images. |
Accuracy; |
| This proposed framework performed on binary classification and achieved a mean accuracy of 97.36%. | ||||
| Sensitivity; | ||||
| The mean sensitivity achieved by this model is 97.65%. | ||||
| Specificity; | ||||
| Also, for the specificity, the mean specificity obtained for 10 fold cross-validation method is 95.48%. |