Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;11:3833. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17680-w

Table 1.

Mean and standard deviation of 287-SNP and 229-SNP polygenic risk scores.

Mean PRS (SD) Mean PRS (SD) Mean PRS (SD) Mean PRS (SD)
287-SNP PRS 287-SNP PRS 229-SNP PRS 229-SNP PRS
Cases, N Controls, N Cases Control Cases Control
Asian studies in BCAC
PRSOVERALL 15,755 16,483 0.91 (0.554) 0.69 (0.556) 1.09 (0.537) 0.88 (0.539)
PRSER+ 10,477 16,483 0.89 (0.580) 0.62 (0.592)
PRSER− 4764 16,483 1.26 (0.543) 1.07 (0.533)
Asian within American studies in BCAC
PRSOVERALL 1507 1212 0.91 (0.560) 0.75 (0.546) 1.09 (0.545) 0.93 (0.529)
PRSER+ 1022 1212 0.89 (0.598) 0.69 (0.583)
PRSER− 280 1212 1.27 (0.513) 1.12 (0.512)
Prospective cohort
PRSOVERALL 413 9842 1.06 (0.539) 0.85 (0.523)
European studies
PRSOVERALL 5129 5285 0.44 (0.608) 0.12 (0.597) 0.72 (0.608) 0.435 (0.556)
PRSER+ 4233 5285 0.43 (0.651) 0.05 (0.638)
PRSER− 926 5285 0.78 (0.560) 0.54 (0.567)

The overall breast cancer (BC) PRS (PRSoverall) and oestrogen-receptor (ER)-positive PRS (PRSER+) and ER-negative PRS (PRSER−) were derived as describe in the “Method” section. ER-subtype is not available for the prospective cohort. Mean and SD of PRS in European studies were calculated using the data on the validation set as described in Mavaddat et. al.7 but samples with missing ages information were removed. BCAC Breast Cancer Association consortium, SD standard deviation, PRS polygenic risk scores.