Table 3.

Enrichment in functional categories, illustrated as relative odds ratio (log e) for upregulated and downregulated DEGs relative to the whole grapevine genome within T1 samples compared to C, within T2 samples compared to C and within T2 samples compared to T1, respectively, at both stages S1 and S2, (S1_C_T1, S2_C_T1, S1_C_T2, S2_C_T2, S1_C_T2 and S2_C_T2).

Functional categories	S1_C_T1	S1_C_T2	S2_C_T1	S2_C_T2	S1_T1_T2	S2_T1_T2
Upregulated
HSP-mediated protein folding	3.16	2.03	X	X	X	X
Storage proteins	1.82	X	X	X	X	X
Antenna proteins	X	3.62	X	X	3.58	X
Photosystem I	X	2.75	X	X	2.91	X
Photosystem II	X	2.58	X	X	2.88	X
tRNA processing	X	3.07	X	X	X	X
Phenylalanine biosynthesis	X	X	X	2.11	X	1.84
Tyrosine catabolism	X	X	X	X	2.71	X
Starch catabolism inhibitor	X	X	X	X	X	4.17
Flavonoid biosynthesis	X	X	X	X	1.72	X
Desiccation stress response	2.9	X	X	X	X	X
Biotic stress response	X	X	X	X	X	1.76
bZIP family transcription factor	2.09	X	X	X	X	X
NAC family transcription factor	X	2.04	X	2.64	X	2.09
mRNA cleavage involved in gene silencing by miRNA	X	2.9	X	X	X	X
Pentatricopeptide domain family	− 1.80E + 304	X	X	X	X	X
Oil body organization and biogenesis	3.23	X	X	X	X	X
Autotransporter	X	X	X	X	2.11	X
Downregulated
HSP-mediated protein folding	X	X	2.86	3.13	2.87	X
Protease inhibition	X	X	3.23	X	X	X
Storage proteins	X	X	X	X	1.83	X
Starch catabolism inhibitor	X	X	4.62	X	X	X
Tyrosine catabolism	X	X	3.17	X	X	X
Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis	X	1.92	2.76	X	X	X
Wounding	X	3.73	X	4.17	3.33	4.76
Desiccation stress response	X	X	X	X	2.93	X
Biotic stress response	X	X	2.3	1.74	1.24	X
Xyloglucan modification	X	2.88	X	X	X	X
Cell wall structural protein	X	X	X	X	X	2.83
Oil body organization and biogenesis	X	3.67	X	X	3.68	X
Protein kinase	X	X	X	X	-1.03	X
ABA-mediated signaling pathway	X	X	X	X	1.48	X
Pentatricopeptide domain family	X	X	X	X	− 1.80E + 304	X

Only categories with adjusted p-values lower than the 0.05 threshold are shown.