Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb 20;223(2):234.e1–234.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.008

Table 3B.

Peri-operative outcomes in women undergoing CPC vs. ERAS in minimally invasive non-hysterectomy procedures

Outcomes CPC ERAS P-value
30-day ED presentation rate n=40/214
(18.7)
n=33/196
(16.8)
.624
Pain 25 (62.5) 17 (51.5) .316
Wound 7 (17.5) 10 (30.3) .490
Chest/Cardiac Pain/VTE 2 (5.0) 5 (15.2) .267
GI 6 (15.0) 5 (15.2) .874
GU 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) -
Other 8 (20.0) 5 (15.2) .986
30-day readmission rate n=5/214
(2.3)
n=6/196
(3.1)
.584
Pain 4 (80.0) 4 (66.7) >.999
GI 1 (25.0) 2 (33.3) .353
Other 2 (40.0) 2 (33.3) >.999

CPC, conventional peri-operative care; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery; PACU, post-anesthesia care unit; ED, emergency department; VTE, venous thromboembolism work-up; GI, gastrointestinal evaluations for ileus, bowel injury, small bowel obstruction, nausea/vomiting, constipation; GU, genitourinary evaluations for bladder and ureteral injury

Data are n (%) and allow for multiple presentation complaints